John Kevin Crowley

John Kevin Crowley

Licensed for 46 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at San Jose, CA
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation

160 W Santa Clara Street, Suite 1180, San Jose, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About John

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 46 years

State: California

Acquired: 1979

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2019

Location

Mesirow, Fink, Crowley & Brereton

160 W Santa Clara Street, Suite 1180, San Jose, CA, 95113-1733

John Kevin Crowley

111 W Saint John St Ste 1200, San Jose, CA, 95113-1107

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John Kevin Crowley's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by anonymous | May 13, 2013 | Contracts & Agreements

Unethical Attorney

 Although I feel this attorney provided less than adequate service in my case, my main reason for submitting this review is to warn the public of his unscrupulous and unethical behavior. This attorney does not honor the contract that he signs. In my opinion, his contract is misleading, fraudulent, ...and dishonorable. The contract clearly states (and I am quoting here) “in the unlikely event of a disagreement as to our bills, or your payment of them, both you and this firm agree to submit any such controversy to binding arbitration in accordance with the State Bar Fee Arbitration Program set out in California Business and Professions Code Section 6200, et seq. You and this firm agree that the arbitrator’s award as to any such dispute shall constitute a binding money judgment between you and this firm, and the prevailing party will have all of the collection rights and privileges of a judgment creditor in accordance with California law.” I did have a disagreement as to his bill; I tried unsuccessfully to negotiate with him, and I did take him to the Santa Clara County Bar Association Fee Arbitration Program TWICE. I won a substantial award each time, from two different panels. The problem is that Mr. Crowley would not agree to BINDING Arbitration either time. His rational was that because we were in the Santa Clara County Bar Association Fee Arbitration Program and not the California State Bar Fee Arbitration Program, he did not have to honor the contract that he signed when I hired him to represent me. Of course, when he signed the contract, he knew the legal loophole he built into the contract. I didn’t. If a County Bar Association, such as a Santa Clara County Bar Association, has a Fee Arbitration Program, then the California State Bar Association defers to them. Because Mr. Crowley’s contract states the State Bar Fee Arbitration Program must be used, and we were using the County Bar Association Fee Arbitration Program, his contract wasn’t binding. He perpetrated this charade even further, by sending me a letter stating (again I am quoting) “It is surely your right to arbitrate the attorney’s fee charged you in this matter. You should contact the Santa Clara County Bar Association and request arbitration of this matter.” I would not have pursued fee arbitration which cost $1200 each time, or spent an additional $30,000 for an attorney to represent me in the Superior Court challenges Mr. Crowley used to avoid paying the substantial judgment awarded to me by the two arbitration panels. Do not go anywhere near this man for help with your legal problems. I regret that I ever heard of him.

See All Client Reviews

John Kevin Crowley's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019.

Public reproval with/duties issued in CA, 2019

updated on 11/27/2019

A censure or reprimand issued by the Supreme Court or the State Bar Court that is not a matter of public record unless imposed after the initiation of formal disciplinary proceedings. No period of suspension is imposed. The reproval may be imposed with duties or conditions.

Education

N/A

Lincoln University Law School

N/A

Santa Clara University

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution