Palo Alto, CA
Litigation Lawyer at Palo Alto, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Intellectual Property
OUTCOME: Successful Markman Hearing. Favorable settlement.
Patent case. Stanacard asserted that Jajah, Inc. service infringed U.S. Pat. No. 7,346,156 related to the use of “virtual telephone numbers.†Obtain favorable claim construction and successfully ... argued that a key claim term was “insoluably ambiguous.†Case settled before summary judgment hearing on patent validity.
OUTCOME: Successful Markman Hearing. Favorable settlement.
Successfully represented APC in defensive action against a North Carolina company involving patents related to power electronics circuitry used in uninterruptible power supplies. Obtained successful M ... arkman decision against Powerware patents. After Markman decision, the case successfully settled.
OUTCOME: Trial Win. Jury Verdict of Non-Infringement
In Intel v. Broadcom, James was one of the lead lawyers representing defendant Broadcom Corporation. James was responsible for defending Broadcom against Intel video patents asserted against Broadcom M ... PEG video decoders. After a 5-week trial, a jury found that the accused Broadcom products did not infringe Intel's video patents. The National Law Journal ranked one of James' cases as the "Top Defense Win" for patent cases in 2001.
OUTCOME: Summary Judgment of Infringement
Successfully represented SanDisk in a patent lawsuit filed against a key competitor, Lexar, relating to flash memory card technology. Obtained summary judgment of infringement against Lexar flash memo ... ry cards, and the Court denied Lexar’s motion seeking summary judgment of invalidity. The case settled shortly afterward with large payment and stipulation of infringement.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
