Nathan O Greene

Nathan O Greene

4.0
Rating: 7.2

Licensed for 20 years

Patent application Lawyer at Palo Alto, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Litigation, Intellectual Property ... +2 more

390 Lytton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA

About Nathan

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Patent Application 70%

Perform patent preparation, prosecution, and opinion work (invalidity, non-infringement, patentability). Clients have included internet search provider, audio technology company, global consulting firm, federal government VAR, networking and telecommunications giant, packaging manufacturer, universities, crane company, and railcar leasing and manufacturing company.

20 years | 150 cases

70%
Litigation 10%

While I have not focused my practice on litigation, I have experience with legal research, brief drafting, and general litigation support. In particular, I was involved in a series of trademark litigations spanning over three years while at Brinks. These cases led to several appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

20 years | 4 cases

10%
Intellectual Property 8%

All of what I do is related to intellectual property (see other categories below). Counsel clients in strategically managing intellectual property assets, often within strict budgets. Provide copyright services and advice. Counsel regarding the interplay between patents and trade secrets, and recommend which to use depending onto situation.

20 years | 200 cases

8%
Trademark Application 8%

Perform trademark searching, clearance and registration services. Services include filing and prosecuting trademark applications to registration. Provide counseling related to oppositions and to assertions of infringement in federal court.

20 years

8%
Licensing 4%

Have worked on various licensing matters dealing with intellectual property rights, including licenses for software, works made for hire, and confidentiality agreements.

20 years

4%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 275-330 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Utah for 20 years

State: Utah

Acquired: 2005

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Lowenstein Sandler

390 Lytton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94301

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Nathan O Greene's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 1
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Andrew | July 06, 2015

Nathan O Greene - Lawyer

Nathan, was alway extremely professional, responsive, and just importantly was always able to add independent and new input to the review, which I greatly apprecated.

See All Client Reviews

Nathan O Greene's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Nathan

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.2 (Very Good)

Honors

2013

Admitted, The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

2004

First Place - Writing Competition, Boston Patent Law Association

2002

Senior Editor, Journal of Law & Technology, Franklin Pierce Law Center

1997

Distinguished Military Graduate, Army R.O.T.C. - Brigham Young University

1997

Communications and Electronics Association Honor Award, Army R.O.T.C. - Brigham Young University

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Counsel Attorney, Lowenstein Sandler

2014 - 2014

Of Counsel, Keller Jolley Preece

2014 - 2015

Of Counsel, Bateman IP Law Group

2006 - 2014

Associate, Brinks Gilson & Lione

2005 - 2005

Judicial Extern Law Clerk, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2005 - 2006

Associate, Stoel Rives

1998 - 2002

Signal Officer, U.S. Army - Signal Corps

Associations

2005 - Present

Utah Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section

Member

2013 - 2014

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Member

2010 - 2010

Utah State Bar, Intellectual Property Section

CLE Planning Committee 2010

2007 - 2014

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member - Electronic & Computer Law Section

1994 - 1997

Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

David Escamilla v. M2 Technology, Inc., 4:12-cv-634-RAS (E.D. Tex.).

Preliminary Injunction denied.

M2 Technology, Inc. v. M2 Software, Inc., 4:12-cv-458-RAS (E.D. Tex.).

Default judgment and fee award against plaintiff affirmed on appeal to 5th Circuit.

M2 Intellectual Property Assets v. M2 Technology, Inc., 4:11-cv-00516-RAS (E.D. Tex.).

Case Dismissed.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2005

University of New Hampshire School of Law, formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center

JD, Master of Intellectual Property, magna cum laude

1997

Brigham Young University

B.S., Cum Laude

Speaking Engagements

2013

Brinks Gilson & Lione Seminar, Salt Lake City, Utah

America Invents Act: What You Should Be Doing Now – Part One

2012

BizNet Connect Entrepreneur Series

Beyond the Basics: Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights

2011

Miller Business Resource Center

Beyond the Basics: Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights

2011

IEEE Computer Society Meeting

Software Development Management to Ensure Open Source Licensing Compliance

2008

Utah Technology Council (UTC) Industry Luncheon

The New Law Under In re Bilski: Are Your Process Patents Now Invalid?

2007

Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione Seminar, Salt Lake City, UT

Prosecution Will Never Be the Same – The New USPTO Rules on Continuations and Claims

Publications

2010

Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) Mountain West Chapter 4th Quarter Newsletter, p. 2 Protecting Against and Reacting to Cybersquatting

Languages

English

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution