Paul S Ham

Paul S Ham

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.7

Licensed for 22 years

Tax fraud and tax evasion Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Tax Fraud & Tax Evasion, Tax, Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal Defense

50 California Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA

About Paul

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2003

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Ham Law Firm

50 California Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA, 94111

Law Offices of Paul S Ham

1300 Clay Street, Suite 600, Oakland, CA, 94612

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Paul S Ham's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Paul S Ham's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Paul
Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 13

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Paul. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Gary Lee Stanley Jr headshot
Gary Stanley

Unknown lawyer | Nov 27

Relationship: Other

"I am very impressed with Paul Ham and his credentials. I endorse this attorney."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.7 (Very Good)

Honors

2006

Outstanding Attorney Award, United States Department of Justice

2004

Certificate of Completion (Civil Trial Advocacy Program), United States Department of Justice

2003

Fellowship, Blackstone

1996

Graduation with Honors, UC Berkeley

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Founder, Ham Law Firm

2007 - 2009

Associate, Baker & McKenzie, LLP

2003 - 2007

Trial Attorney, Department of Justice, Tax Division

Associations

2009 - Present

Alameda County Bar Association

Member

2008 - Present

San Francisco Bar Association

Member

2008 - Present

California State Bar, Taxation Section

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Hutchinson v. United States

Summary Judgment in favor of client

United States v. Carey

Partial reversal and remand in favor of client.

Kruslic v. Keene

Denial of Petition in favor of client

United States v. Padilla

Enforcement of lien in favor of client

In re Handelsman

Affirmation of BK Order in favor of client

Hawkins v. United States

Stipulated Dismissal in favor of client

Estate of Charles Tison v. United States

Unanimous jury verdict in favor of client.

Hasty v. United States

Denial of Petition in favor of client

Atkins v. United States

Dismissal in favor of client

United States v Carey

$6.5 million judgment in favor of client.

Dean v. IRS

Summary judgment in favor of client.

Hahn v. Keith

Dismissal in favor of client

Northwest Trustee Services v. Cardone, et al.

Distribution of funds in favor of client

United State v. Martinez

Summary judgment in favor of client

Puhn, et al. v. IRS

Dismissal of Petition in favor of client

Vance Aircraft v. IRS

Distribution of funds

CTC Real Estate Services v. United States

Distribution of funds to client

United States v. Cunningham

Judgment in favor of client

United States v. Loomis

Turnover of property in favor of client

United States v Carey

Partial summary judgment in favor of client

United States v. Lidco

Attachment of transferee liability

Wolf Law Firm v. United States

Distribution of funds in favor of client

Phoenix Cobalt v. United States

Stipulated Judgment in favor of client

United States v. Verni

Judgment in favor of client

Fidelity National v. All Claimants

Distribution of funds in favor of client

United States v. Garland

Judgment in favor of client

United States v. Garland

Judgment in favor of client

In re McFadden

Dismissal of Petition in favor of client

Carey v. Andrews, et al.

Dismissal of case in favor of client

United States v. Boyd

Judgment in favor of client

Ronnie Green v. Bank One, et al

Distribution of funds in favor of client

Miraldi v. Censire

Denial of Petition in favor of client

DeVries v. IRS

Dismissal of case in favor of client

Cranford v. United States

Dismissal in favor of client.

Combs v. IRS

Dismissal of case in favor of client

First American Mortgage v. Kause, et al

Distribution of funds in favor of client

Albertson v. Winters, et al

Dismissal of case in favor of client

Monroe v. Schneider

Dismissal of case in favor of client

Amador Equity v. Virdell, et al

Distribution of funds to client.

Shannon v. Anderson

Dismissal in favor of client

Wingle v. IRS

Dismissal of case in favor of client

United States v. Brooks

Judgment in favor of client

People of CA v United States

Dismissal of case in favor of client

Placer Foreclosure v. Cichowicz

Distribution of funds to client

Frank Kuest v. United States,

Complete concession in favor of client after takin

United States v. Sanders

Summary judgment in favor of client.

Waterhouse v. United States

Dismissal of case in favor of client.

Laber v. Dep’t of the Treasury

Summary judgment in favor of client.

Sygitowicz v United States

Partial Summary Judgment in favor of client

Dean v. IRS

Summary judgment in favor of client.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2003

UCLA School of Law

law

1996

Univ of California Berkeley

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2008

Tax Chat (Internal Presentation)

Work Product Privilege Issues with Respect to Documents Shared with a Corporation's Independent Auditors

Publications

2007

2007

American Federal Tax Reporter United States v. Reed

2007

American Federal Tax Reporter Krsulic v. Keene

2007

American Federal Tax Reporter United States v. Carey

2007

American Federal Tax Reporter Dean v. IRS

2007

American Federal Tax Reports Waterhouse v. United States

2006

American Federal Tax Reporter United States v. Padilla

2006

American Federal Tax Reporter Hasty v. United States

2006

American Federal Tax Reports Laber v. Dep’t of the Treasury

2005

District Court Decision Cranford v. United States

2005

American Federal Tax Reporter DeVries v. IRS

2005

American Federal Tax Reporter Green v. Bank One

2005

American Federal Tax Reporter United States v. Verni

2005

Lexis Nexis Publishing United States v. Boyd

2005

American Federal Tax Reports United States v. Sanders

2004

Lexis Nexis Publishing Amador Equity v. Virdell

Languages

Korean

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution