Guy Wainwright Stilson

Guy Wainwright Stilson

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.1

Licensed for 36 years

Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Business, Contracts & Agreements, Intellectual Property

505 Montgomery St., 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA

About Guy

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 450-450 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 36 years

State: California

Acquired: 1989

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Low, Ball & Lynch, A Professional Corporation

505 Montgomery St., 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94111

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Guy Wainwright Stilson's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Guy Wainwright Stilson's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Guy

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.1 (Very Good)

Honors

N/A

Wiley W. Manuel Award, California Bar Association

N/A

Outstanding Volunteer in Public Service Award, San Francisco Bar Association

Work Experience

1994 - 1999

Senior Attorney, Stilson Law Offices

Sample of Legal Cases

Valdez, et al., v Santa Lucia Preserve Co.

Full vindication for client.

Plancarte v Guardsmark, 118 Cal.App.4th 640

Summary judgment affirmed. Published/precedential opinion.

Hroscikoski v. City of Glendale, 146 Fed.Appx. 94

Summary judgment affirmed.

Hall v North American Van Lines, 476 F.34d 683

Affirmed by Ninth Circuit. Published/precedential opinion.

Schultz v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District, 240 Fed.Appx. 766

Affirmed by Ninth Circuit. Sanctions awarded against appellant for frivolous appeal.

Amberger-Warren v. City of Piedmont, 143 Cal.App.4th 1074

Summary judgment affirmed in full. Published/precedential opinion.

Sacramento Suncreek v. Cambridge Advantages Properties II, 187 Cal.App.4th 1

Affirmed in full. Published/precedential opinion.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1986

University of California - Los Angeles

BA

N/A

Davis King Hall School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution