Andrew Mayer Zacks

Andrew Mayer Zacks

also known as Andrew M. Zacks

Licensed for 36 years

Real estate Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Real Estate, Land Use & Zoning, Landlord & Tenant

601 Montgomery Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Andrew

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 35 years

State: California

Acquired: 1990

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 36 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1989

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Zacks & Freedman, P.C.

601 Montgomery Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94111

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Andrew Mayer Zacks's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 3
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Posted by anonymous | March 07, 2012 | Real Estate

Best Real Estate Attorney in California

Andrew Zacks and his partner Scott Freedman succeeded in rescinding the purchase of a multi-million dollar, newly remodeled house we bought that had several undisclosed defects. After living in the house for about 6 months, we began to experience water intrusion on the ground level. Initially we co...nsulted Andrew to help us fix the problem, hire the best engineers to come up with a repair plan, and make sure that the sellers compensated us for all our costs. But as we tried to come up with a repair plan, it became increasingly clear that this was no easy fix. Because Andrew is such a highly respected attorney, he was able to assemble a team of San Francisco's best engineers and other professionals to help us understand the extent of the problems. While they eventually came up with a repair plan, they also told us that it would be expensive, time consuming and technically difficult, which helped us decide to move forward with rescission. During arbitration, our opposition's experts maintained that the repairs were easy, quick and inexpensive. But because Andrew had assembled a superior team with years of experience in San Francisco, our side had more credibility, which ultimately helped us win rescission. Proving that the sellers engaged in intentional fraud was not easy, especially because during the discovery phase, they did not produce many important documents. Andrew and Scott were relentless in following up with other witnesses to get as many of the missing documents as possible. They noticed the smallest of details, like a different personal email address that one real estate agent had used that led to a whole new batch of emails that helped prove that the other side wasn't telling the truth. Andrew was always realistic in setting our expectations. He told us that it's difficult to win a rescission case. But when we told him we felt like we had no other choice, that repair wasn't an option and that the sellers had intentionally deceived us, he and his firm fought heart and soul to win our case. Part of what makes Andrew a fabulous attorney is his quick strategic thinking - whether he's cross-examining a witness or reacting to some new twist in the case, Andrew is always taking in new information and reassessing the best course of action. I firmly believe part of what helped us win our case is the realistic and reasonable tone Andrew and Scott set throughout the arbitration proceedings. They never pulled cheap stunts. They take the high road. They are gentlemen. The award they asked the arbitrator to give us was reasonable and fair, not pie in the sky. Not only did we win rescission, but the arbitrator awarded us everything we asked for monetarily. At our request, Andrew recommended and worked with a bankruptcy attorney to make sure any settlement agreement was iron clad and that we could actually collect the money. From start to finish, Andrew Zacks is the best real estate attorney in California.

Posted by anonymous | January 11, 2012 | Real Estate

Review of Andrew Zacks

I am a practicing real estate attorney and have been for the past 40 years. I have worked with hundreds of attorneys, many as my counsel on investment matters and well as in my practice. I would rate Andrew among the very best with whom I've worked. He is knowledgeable, practical, has excellent bu...siness judgment, quickly and effectively assesses client needs and is a pleasure to work with. In addition to Landlord/Tenant matters, Andrew has provided invaluable counsel on a broad range of real property matters.

Posted by John | January 11, 2012 | Landlord & Tenant

Andrew Zacks and his firm are A+++ and more

Andrew and his firm are A+++, especially in Landlord/Tenant and Real Estate matters, due to rare combinations of outstanding talents and exceptionally innovative and hard, tireless work.

See All Client Reviews

Andrew Mayer Zacks's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Andrew
Michael F. Corbett headshot
Michael Corbett

Real estate lawyer | Mar 29

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Paul Jeffrey Katz headshot
Paul Katz

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Sep 23

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Andrew's stellar career is no coincidence. His success derives from his keen legal mind and his attention to his clients' needs. There is no better attorney handling residential real estate matters in the San Francisco Bay Area."

Justin Alda Goodman headshot
Justin Goodman

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Dec 26

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer."

Joseph Tobener headshot
Joseph Tobener

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Nov 04

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Paul Jeffrey Katz headshot
Paul Katz

Appeals lawyer

Mark B Chernev headshot
Mark Chernev

Real estate lawyer

Justin Alda Goodman headshot
Justin Goodman

Landlord or tenant lawyer

Experience

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Client Distinction Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2005

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2004

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

N/A

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Founder, Zacks & Freedman, P.C.

Sample of Legal Cases

Tom at al v City and County of San Francisco

Judgment for Property Owners Affirmed

Drouet v Superior Court

Petition for Review Granted and Victory for Landlord

See More Legal Cases

Education

1987

Santa Clara University

JD

1983

University of California - Santa Cruz

BA

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution