Plaintiff vs. Geico Insurance Company
N/AOUTCOME: Policy limits maximum settlement
Represented client struck by a car while crossing the street on his bicycle. Obtained maximum policy limits settlement.
Camarillo, CA
Litigation Lawyer at Camarillo, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Intellectual Property ... +6 more
OUTCOME: Policy limits maximum settlement
Represented client struck by a car while crossing the street on his bicycle. Obtained maximum policy limits settlement.
OUTCOME: Policy limits maximum settlement
Represented client injured in car accident. The insurance company contended that the plaintiff's injuries were due to a previous accident only months before. Client obtained the maximum policy limits ... settlement.
OUTCOME: $200,000.00
Represented client in claim against insurance company for injuries sustained in diving accident. Insurance company claimed that client's injuries were due to degenerative disease and not injury. Obta ... ined settlement of $200,000.00.
OUTCOME: Election invalidated
Represented homeowner who claimed that the Association's elections violated California law and the Association's bylaws. After trial, the court invalidated the election and ordered a new election. Th ... e court also ordered the Association to pay the homeowner's attorney fees and costs.
OUTCOME: Judgment of dismissal in favor of client
Represented investor accused of bank fraud in connection with $3.5 million bid for commercial property.
OUTCOME: $2,000,000.00
Represented investor who alleged that it was not paid what it was owed under its contract with a television producer.
OUTCOME: Settled after judgment reversed on appeal
Client appealed to the Ninth Circuit from District Court's dismissal of trademark infringement claims on summary judgment. Client prevailed on appeal.
OUTCOME: Appeal successful and dismissal of client's case reversed
Client appealed to Ninth Circuit from District Court's dismissal of case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
OUTCOME: Judgment of dismissal in favor of client
Represented course articulation services provider accused of trademark infringement, domain name infringement and false advertising.
OUTCOME: Judgment of dismissal in favor of client
Represented clients accused of copyright infringement, fraud and unfair competition.