William Lee Buus

PRO

William Lee Buus

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 30 years

Litigation Lawyer at Brea, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Trademark Infringement, Securities & Investment Fraud, Patent Infringement

3 Pointe Drive, Suite 110, Brea, CA

Virtual Consultation Available

About William

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Litigation 40%

General business litigation representation for both plaintiff and defendant

31 years | 550 cases

40%
Securities and Investment Fraud 25%

Securities litigation involving securities purchases/sales and shareholder suits

25 years | 100 cases

25%
Trademark Infringement 25%

Litigation representation for both plaintiff and defendant

25 years | 100 cases

25%
Patent Infringement 10%

Litigation representation for both plaintiff and defendant

25 years | 50 cases

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in California for 30 years

State: California

Acquired: 1995

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Buus Law Group APC

3 Pointe Drive, Suite 110, Brea, CA, 92821

buuslaw.com/

William Lee Buus's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

11 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (11) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Hua | April 28, 2017 | Hired Attorney

Very professional

Bill and his team are very professional and always available to answer the questions and concerns.

Posted by Angelina | September 09, 2009 | Class Action

Marselle / Buus review

Mr. Buus is an amazing attorney. He's representing a group of us in a "mass-action" lawsuit. Over the last 12 months in working with him, Mr. Buus has been very accomodating to all our needs, communicative (explaining step-by-step the progression of the case), and has a way about him that makes us... all have a sense that he's taking good care of us. Even though he is extremely busy, he has always returned my phone call the same day. That to me is very important, which is why I will continue to use him as my attorney. I have also found Mr. Buus to be knowledgeable in many areas of law, which, again, gives me the comfort in knowing that I have an excellent attorney representing me.

See All Client Reviews

William Lee Buus's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse William
Steve Tzong-Bing Tsai headshot
Steve Tsai

Litigation lawyer | May 01

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Bill more than 15 years, and worked with him on a number of cases during this time. Bill is an excellent trial attorney and I highly recommend him."

Douglas James Pettibone headshot
Douglas Pettibone

Litigation lawyer | Sep 22

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. William Buss is a hardworking gifted trial lawyer. He has strong skills and experience"

Eric Martin Schiffer headshot
Eric Schiffer

Intellectual property lawyer | Jun 23

Relationship: Co-worker

"Bill is one of the finest lawyers I know. Bill is detail-oriented, intelligent, and understands client expectations. He is the person I always call when I need to consult on a case. I am proud to call him my law partner, and even prouder to call him my friend."

John L. Hendricks headshot
John Hendricks

Litigation lawyer | Sep 22

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Bill is a highly skilled legal strategist and litgator. I have worked with him on complex patent litigation cases and have the highest regard for his legal judgment."

John Young Kim headshot
John Kim

Litigation lawyer | Sep 10

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer's work. He is hard working, intelligent and honest."

Hubert H Kuo headshot
Hubert Kuo

Litigation lawyer | Sep 09

Relationship: Co-worker

"I first met Bill when he was defending a co-defendant in a complex civil litigation case. I've then had the fortune to work with him at a boutique Irvine firm. Finally, I am proud to be able to call him a partner/shareholder in our current firm. Bill is a brilliant legal strategist and a trusted partner. I would fully entrust all of my legal affairs to Bill."

John Duy Tran headshot
John Tran

Litigation lawyer | Sep 09

Relationship: Co-worker

"I highly endorse the litigation work of Mr. William L. Buus in the areas of intellectual property, business disputes, securities fraud and general civil litigation. Bill is an excellent trial lawyer who uses his court room experience and knowledge of the law to help his clients obtain outstanding results in litigation. Bill is also very personable, cares for the best interests of his clients and takes the time to explain issues with his clients."

Paul Thomas Minerich headshot
Paul Minerich

Business lawyer | Sep 04

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known and worked with Mr. Buus for over 20 years and I would recommend him without any hesitation."

Jonathan Stuart Pink headshot
Jonathan Pink

Public finance and tax exempt finance lawyer | Aug 31

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer's work."

Eric Douglas Leach headshot
Eric Leach

Litigation lawyer | Aug 27

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"William Buus is the most talented attorney I've ever met. As my mentor, he taught me everything I know about litigation. His procedural knowledge is impeccable. He is also a kind and caring human being. If I were on death row, he's the only lawyer I would want defending me."

View All Endorsements
Donald Walter Sieveke headshot
Donald Sieveke

Litigation lawyer

Steve Tzong-Bing Tsai headshot
Steve Tsai

Litigation lawyer

Douglas James Pettibone headshot
Douglas Pettibone

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Eric Martin Schiffer headshot
Eric Schiffer

Litigation lawyer

Jonathan Stuart Pink headshot
Jonathan Pink

Intellectual property lawyer

John L. Hendricks headshot
John Hendricks

Patent infringement lawyer

John Young Kim headshot
John Kim

Contracts and agreements lawyer

Hubert H Kuo headshot
Hubert Kuo

Litigation lawyer

John Duy Tran headshot
John Tran

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2022

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

AV Pre-eminent, Martindale-Hubbell®

2014

Top Orange County Lawyer, OC Metro Magazine

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2006

Rising Star, Super Lawyer Magazine

Work Experience

2022 - Present

Principal, Buus Law Group APC

2010 - 2022

Shareholder, Schiffer & Buus APC

2006 - 2010

Shareholder, Buus Kim Kuo & Tran APC

2001 - 2006

Partner, Oswald & Yap APC

1996 - 2000

Associate, Ness & Associates

Associations

2020 - Present

Orange County Bar Association

Master Lawyers Division Member

2012 - Present

American Board of Trial Advocates (Orange County chapter)

Associate

2011 - Present

Orange County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Barsegyan v. Torabian

FINRA arbitration award for the client/claimant

Boulter v. Boulter

Judgment for the defense.

Quoc Viet Inc. v. VV Foods

Jury Verdict for Plaintiff

Universal Products v. Omega Products

$500,000 jury verdict for Plaintiff

Silver State v. FuturaNet

$200,000 Jury Verdict for Plaintiff

Wakefield v. Olen Properties

Defense Judgment

Boulter v. Boulter

Favorable Corporate Valuation for Client

Wittenberg v. Beachwalk Homeowners Association

Invalidation of Association Election

Greenlight Financial v. Internet Brands

Jury Verdict of $750,000

Begole v. Trenkle

Jury Verdict, Judgment for Plaintiff, $2.8 Million.

Protech v. Velox

Defense Verdict

Vietnam Telecom International v. Inyang

Jury Verdict, Judgment for Defense

Cowle v. Colleary

Jury Verdict for the Defense

Richter v. Supa Technology

Jury Verdict

Morton Machiner v. JK Main

Jury verdict for the Defense.

Burgess v. Martindale

Award for Petitioner of $300,000

Velox v. Jimray

Jury Verdict for Plaintiff, $2.89 Million

Stilwell v. Disney

Jury Verdict for Defense

Garlich v. Town Center Assn

Jury Verdict for Defense

See More Legal Cases

Education

1995

Southwestern Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1991

California State University, Long Beach

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2000

Principals of the Carmack Amendment

Camack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act

Publications

2006

Business Connection (Irvine Chamber of Commerce) Tips to Avoid Lawsuits

2005

The Gavel (OCTLA) Proving Actual Damages in Real Estate Non-Disclosure Actions

2004

Los Angeles Daily Journal Lawyers Should Encourage Jurors to Question Witnesses

2004

Los Angeles Daily Journal Proving Loss of Profits is Daunting But Manageable

2004

Los Angeles Daily Journal Plan Carefully to Discover Who Controls Corporation

2004

Los Angeles Daily Journal Get Expert Help to Decide on Recoverable Damages

1998

Common Assessment Magazine Reduce Sidewalk Liability with a Maintenance Plan

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution