Charles Michael Farano

Charles Michael Farano

also known as Farano Law Group APC

4.7
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 46 years

Financial markets and services Lawyer at Anaheim, CA
Practice Areas: Financial Markets and Services, Business, Trusts ... +2 more

4501 East LaPalma Ave Ste 240, Anaheim, CA

About Charles

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 46 years

State: California

Acquired: 1979

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Farano Law Group APC - Charles M Farano J.D. LLM Taxation

4501 East LaPalma Ave Ste 240, Anaheim, CA, 92807

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Charles Michael Farano's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

15 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (15) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by David | January 18, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Business

Extremely knowledgeable, fair and professional

Thank you Charles for your help. You are definitely in a league of your own. If you are looking for an experienced attorney that will fight for you, Charles is definitely your guy. I had a business dispute and he laid out options that were clear, satisfactory, and to the point. Dave

Posted by Allan | November 03, 2014 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Excellent Service from Mr. Farano

I have used Mr. Farano's legal services on two occaisions, once for a civil case and once for a criminal matter involving a family member. In both cases I was very pleased with Mr. Farano's services. He made sure that he clearly understood our objectives, kept us informed, and demostrated knowledge... and professionalism. I highly recommend Mr. Farano.

Posted by anonymous | October 14, 2011 | Child Custody

save your money - horrible experience!!!

Charles Farano was the biggest waste of my money. I paid $1750 after our first meeting and received absolutely no service thereafter. My case was a simple child custody case where my child's father wanted to secure custody. I had no problem with it. At one point I wanted to change a meeting time ...to allow my daughter to attend an after school sport. I figured this would be easy as it would also keep both parties out of traffic, including my daughter who has to be in a car for 3 hours every two weeks. I have never felt more alone then when I was in court with Mr. Farano and getting slammed by my child’s father’s attorney. When the other attorney was done I expected my attorney to defend me, or at least argue for the reason we were there. NOT A WORD!!! When the session was done we parted ways. He was cold as ice, and I was in tears. Not once did Mr. Farano council me or explain why he rolled over so pathetically. It was done and so was his work, if his work ever started. In addition to a poor courtroom experience his communications and his assistant’s communications were subpar. His female assistant literally got into a verbal confrontation on the phone with my fiancé when my fiancé called to request their office communicate better with our family. My fiancé could see I was frustrated and requested they keep in touch with me more often. She yelled at him stating they were communicating efficiently enough and proceeded to hang up on him (What happened to "the customer is always right?"). In addition to that, their office constantly emailed important documents to me and failed to follow up to see if I received them. One occurrence almost caused me serious fines due to a late response to a simple question that anyone would have been able to answer in the matter of seconds. At the end of the day I was very disappointed by this experience. I am 100% certain that I received NO services for the money I paid. If you’re considering hiring Mr. Farano save your money. Do something fun with it instead. I say...if you’re going to lose in court you might as well treat yourself to a good time. Being in the presence of Charles Michael Farano certainly is no good time!!!

See All Client Reviews

Charles Michael Farano's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Charles
Mengjun Qiu headshot
Mengjun Qiu

Employment and labor lawyer | Jan 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Richard John Kossler II headshot
Richard Kossler

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 08

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer. Charles Farano (Chuck) is a great trial attorney. I have worked with him in the past and have referred him a number of clients. He is always knowledgeable on the topic at hand and has done great work for each referred client."

Bert Briones headshot
Bert Briones

White collar crime lawyer | Jul 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Farano brings rare experience in Business Litigation, UCC Law, Anti-Trust Law, and Recelverships which results in an outstanding background to a white collar criminal defense case."

View All Endorsements
Bert Briones headshot
Bert Briones

Chapter 7 bankruptcy lawyer

Douglas MacMillan Borthwick headshot
Douglas Borthwick

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Richard John Kossler II headshot
Richard Kossler

Transportation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2019

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Board Certified, National Board of Trial Advocacy

2014

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

2009

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

2006

Super Lawyer, California Super Lawyers

Work Experience

1990 - 1992

Assistant Prosecutor, City of Orange

Associations

1995 - Present

Certified by the National Board of Trial Advocates

Member

1995 - Present

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

Member

1985 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

People v. Stephouse Recovery Inc

Case Dismissed in favor of Charles M Farano and Stephouse Recovery

See More Legal Cases

Education

1978

Western State College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1974

California State University

Bachelors Degree

1970

Mater Dei High School in Santa Ana

N/A

California St Univ Stanislaus

Speaking Engagements

1993

Code enforcement

National Business Institute, 1993 and 2000; Code Enforcement Institute, 1990 - 1995.

Publications

1983

California Bar Journal Global Van Lines v. Superior Court, 144 Cal. App. 3d 483 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1983)

N/A

California Bar Journal Suburban Motors v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 218 Cal. App. 3d 1354 (Cal. App. 3d Dist. 1990);
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution