Find a Lawyer California Palm Springs Employment
Thomas Stephen Slovak

PRO

Thomas Stephen Slovak

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 51 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Palm Springs, CA
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Litigation

1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA

Call for a consultation (760) 276-6482

Message
Thomas Stephen Slovak's Website
Overview Reviews Experience
Overview Reviews Experience
Call for a consultation (760) 276-6482

About Thomas

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 50%

50%
Litigation 50%

50%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Contact for Details

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

An elite group of attorneys who have been rated highly by their peers as having Very High Ethical Standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

This is the highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Licenses

Licensed in California for 51 years

State: California

Acquired: 1974

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Slovak Baron & Empey LLP

(760) 322-2107

Fax

1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA, 92262-7104

sbemp.com/thomasslovak.html
Get Directions

Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP

1800 E Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA, 92262-7104

sbemp.com/thomasslovak.html
Get Directions

Thomas Stephen Slovak's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Thomas Stephen Slovak's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Thomas
Bruce Neil Anticouni headshot
Bruce Anticouni

Business lawyer | Feb 17

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Tom is an excellent trial attorney. He is highly regarding in both the business and employment areas of the law. I highly recommend him for any legal matter in California."

John Oli Alvin Pinkney headshot
John Pinkney

Native peoples law lawyer | Dec 12

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. Tom is a lawyers lawyer. Tom and I just concluded a very complex federal court case involving sovereignty issues in Madera County. There were multiple parties and law firms adverse to our client not to mention complex and changing factual circumstances. Tom worked tirelessly every evening and weekend for months until we prevailed. Tom also worked hard in an effort to bring the parties together. But when it became clear that was not possible, he put all that he had into prevailing in court, which we did. I enjoy working with hard working, smart, creative and energetic attorneys. Tom has all of these attributes."

Guenther Antonio Richter headshot
Guenther Richter

Litigation lawyer | Jun 22

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer. Tom Slovak is one of the best litigators I have ever had the pleasure of working with."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2015

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2002

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2001

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2000

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1999

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1998

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1997

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1996

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1995

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1994

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1993

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1992

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1991

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1990

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1989

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1988

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1987

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1986

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1985

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1981

BV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1993 - 2015

Partner, Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP

1981 - 1993

Partner, Best Best & Krieger LLP

1974 - 1981

Associate, Best Best & Krieger LLP

Associations

1983 - Present

Fee Arbitration Panel

Chairman

1983 - Present

Trial Lawyers of America

Member

1981 - Present

Riverside County Bar Association

Member, Superior Court Settlement Panel

1974 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

1974 - Present

Desert Bar Association

Member

1974 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1986 - 1987

Desert Bar Association

President

1983 - 1985

Civil Courts/Litigation Section

Chairman

1981 - 1985

Desert Bar Association

Board of Directors

Education

1974

University of Southern California Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1971

California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2002

National Business Institute

Superior Deposition Strategies in California Civil Trial Practice

Publications

2000

California Lawyer There is More to Arbitration Than Just Arbitrating

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution
Learn More About the Avvo Rating