We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Sheriff A. Issa
About Sheriff
Practice Areas
3
Practice Areas
Fees and Rates
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in District of Columbia for 9 years
State: District of Columbia
Acquired: 2016
No misconduct found
Licensed in California for 10 years
State: California
Acquired: 2015
No misconduct found
Location
Obrero Law
15303 Ventura Blvd, Suite 900, Sherman Oaks, CA, 91403
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Sheriff A. Issa's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
10 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (10)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge
Posted by Hannah Kim | August 12, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
Excellent Legal Service!
Very compassionate and thorough. He provided us with the answers to all of our questions. He helped us organize the applicable evidence in front of the judge in a clear and concise manner. He also gave us different options and strategies to approach the case. And, at the end of the day, he was an ama...
Posted by anonymous | August 05, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Landlord & Tenant
Prompt Solutions
He advised me step by step on what I should do in a renting circumstance I was having. He took the time to listen to the whole story and was very prompt when sought for. Mr. Issa negotiates well with others regardless of their character and is honest and comitted.
Posted by Enrique | April 07, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Landlord & Tenant
Amazing attorney and great guy
My wife and I were having a truly hard time with negligent and non-paying tenants, but Sheriff saved the day. He took care of everything from the paperwork to coming to a successful mediation with the tenants. He made sure that it was all taken care of, but more importantly he made sure WE were taken...
Posted by Daniel | April 05, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Appeals
Really caring. Loved dealing with him
Helped us on an appeal after we lost. He got us cleared of everything. He was really helpful.
Sheriff A. Issa's Lawyer Endorsements
"I have personally referred cases to Sheriff, and witnessed the superb quality of service and competency he exercises over each case. I can rest assured that the clients I refer to him will be happy both with his representation, and me, for referring them. Sheriff is a highly skilled practitioner whose knowledge of the law and expertise is unmatched. Sheriff is a superb advocate for his clients. I endorse this lawyer."
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
Experience
Honors
2016
Clients' Choice Award 2016 (Real Estate), Avvo
2013
CALI Excellence Award - Real Property Law, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
2013
CALI Excellence Award - Intro to Mediation, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Work Experience
2016 - Present
Of Counsel, Potier Law Group
2015 - Present
Attorney, The Issa Law Group
Associations
2016 - Present
State Bar of California, Real Property Law SectionAttorney
2015 - Present
State Bar of CaliforniaAttorney
2015 - Present
Long Beach BarristersAttorney
2015 - Present
Long Beach Bar AssociationAttorney
2015 - Present
South Bay Bar AssociationAttorney
2015 - Present
Los Angeles County Bar AssociationAttorney
Sample of Legal Cases
Hatanaka v. Olde Time Termite Control Co.
PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE AND RECOVER NOTHING ON THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM, AND THAT THE DEFENDANT(S) (OLDE TIME TERMITE CONTROL COMPANY INC) SHALL HAVE JUDGMENT FOR COSTS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUM OF $ 0.00
DINO MARTIN VS. WBN HOME DESIGN, INC
SHALL HAVE AND RECOVER NOTHING BY THIS ACTION, AND THAT THE DEFENDANT(S)/APPELLANT(S) SHALL HAVE JUDGMENT FOR COSTS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUM OF $ 00.00
Ramirez v. Lopez
Case Remanded back to Superior Court. Tenant agreed to vacate within 15 days.
FAYE v. SMITH & KELLY USED CARS & RENTALS, INC. SCCase #15M04870
PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE AND RECOVER NOTHING BY THIS ACTION, & DEFENDANT(S)/APPELLANT(S) SHALL HAVE JUDGMENT FOR COSTS IN THE SUM OF $ 75.00 . JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT 1 & 3. DEFENDANT-2 KELLYS USED CARS & RENTALS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Education
2014
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
Languages
Arabic
English
Activity
Legal Answers
Legal Answers
Q&A
In Los Angeles County, can a landlord evict month-to-month tenants without paying any relocations fees?
31 Mar 2017
Q&A
Does the landlord need give notice to tenant that sale the property
31 Mar 2017
Q&A
What is the difference between Interspousal Transfer Grant Deed and a Quit Claim Deed documents?
31 Mar 2017