Free Consultation
$0 first 20 minutes
Neil R Anapol
About Neil
Practice Areas
5
Practice Areas
Insurance
35%
36 years
Wrongful Termination
35%
26 years
Class Action
10%
27 years
Personal Injury
10%
36 years
Fees and Rates
Cost
Payment Methods
- Cash
- Check
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in California for 36 years
State: California
Acquired: 1989
No misconduct found
Location
Neil Anapol
500 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 920, Glendale, CA, 91203
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Neil R Anapol's Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by anonymous | April 1, 2024 | Consulted Attorney
This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.
Bright up my search
i might not found the lawyer im looking for but with my own due diligence i was in the right path and he guided me to it. thank you for your consultation and i just hope you are my lawyer.
Posted by Lafamilylawattorney | May 26, 2023 | Consulted Attorney
This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.
A lawyers lawyer
I have consulted with Neil on a few personal matters. He caught on quickly, identified the salient issues right away, and was able to help me obtain favorable results. He has great verbal and written communication skills. I would not hesitate to refer him to any of my clients in help of the services...
Posted by Katherine | March 3, 2020 | Consulted Attorney
This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.
Best Lawyer Around
Neil Anapol is an excellent attorney. He identifies the legal issues immediately and gives very good advice. He has excellent communication skills and is able to convey his point quickly and accurately. He is hard working and gets the job done correctly. I would recommend him to anyone needing le...
Neil R Anapol's Lawyer Endorsements
"The answers of Mr. Anapol are consistently accurate, analytic and customized to the needs of the Avvo asker. These are exactly the qualities than any client would look for when hiring an attorney."
"Neil Anapol demonstrates extensive knowledge and experience in a wide variety of legal matters. His responses on Avvo are remarkably thoughtful, articulate and accurate. I have tremendous respect for his sound legal knowledge and ability to communicate that knowledge. He is a true asset to our legal community. It is my pleasure to endorse him."
"I endorse this lawyer. He offers consistently well-considered, smart analysis and is a valuable contributor to this forum."
"Neil is a talented and skilled advocate for his clients. He has consistently demonstrated competent advocacy at a high level in his practice areas. I would highly recommend him; and as a member of the Avvo community I fully endorse him."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"Neil has an incredible work ethic and knows his subjects well. I would recommend any of my clients to him for his knowledge and caring."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I highly recommend Neil. His is smart, hard-working, and able to achieve excellent results for his clients. I have referred clients to him in the past and will continue to do so."
Trent Copeland
Criminal defense lawyer
Experience
Work Experience
1999 - 1999
Associate, Shernoff Bidart & Darras, LLP
1997 - 1999
Associate, Harvey Lerer & Associates
1995 - 1997
Associate, Pollak, Vida & Fisher
Associations
1999 - Present
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los AngelesMember
Sample of Legal Cases
Alborzian v. J.P. Morgan Chase (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 29
Trial court decision reversed by Court of Appeal
Education
N/A
UCLA SOL
law
N/A
Northwestern Univ
undergraduate
Languages
English
Activity
Legal Answers
Legal Answers
Q&A
How is a title of real property interpreted, when there are only their names no other clarification
10 Feb 2026
Q&A
I think I have a case
10 Feb 2026
Q&A
California: How long is too long for a lawyer to pursue the property damage portion of a car acciden
06 Feb 2026