Claire Christine Weglarz

Claire Christine Weglarz

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.3

Licensed for 21 years

Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Personal Injury

445 S Figueroa St Ste 3200, Los Angeles, CA

About Claire

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 21 years

State: California

Acquired: 2004

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP

445 S Figueroa St Ste 3200, Los Angeles, CA, 90071-1651

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Claire Christine Weglarz's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Claire Christine Weglarz's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Claire

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.3 (Very Good)

Honors

2011

Super Lawyer "Rising Star", Super Lawyers Magazine

2010

Super Lawyer "Rising Star", Super Lawyers Magazine

2009

Super Lawyer "Rising Star", Super Lawyers Magazine

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Partner, Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP

2005 - 2008

Attorney, Harrington, Foxx, Dubrow & Canter

Associations

Trial Attorneys of America

Member

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

Defense Research Institute (DRI)

Young Lawyers Committee

Central City Association

Member

State Bar of California

Member

American Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Richard Whittenburg and Shuiyu Hu Whittenburg v. John Crane Inc., et al.

Plaintiffs dismissed HPTY’s client following opening statements and cross-examination of Plaintiffs’ expert industrial hygienist.

James Harkin v. John Crane Inc., et al.

The jury declined this invitation finding in favor of both John Crane Inc. and Oscar E. Erickson, and returning a complete defense verdict.

Parga v. Caterpillar Industrial, Inc., et al.

Favored during jury selection.

Schildknegt v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.

After about four hours of deliberation, the ten woman and two man jury returned a defense verdict for both defendants.

Silas J. Minton, Jr. and Stacey L. Minton v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc., et al.

After four weeks of trial, HPTY was able to resolve the matter favorably for the client. Ana Portillo and Taylor Giannasi also assisted in defending the case.

Steven Burleson, et al. v. 3M Company, et al.

Resolved favorably for client during jury selection.

Schott, et al. v. Alfa Laval, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff was unable to prove causation.

William Patchen v. A.W. Chesterton, et al.

Exposure to asbestos was insufficient to have caused the disease.

Keeney, et al. v. A.W. Chesterton Company, et al.

Robert Niebauer, et al. v. 3M Company

Resolved at trial.

William Collins, et al. v. State of California, et al.

Defense Verdict, Demand was for 25 million on first day of trial.

Mendez v. Bobcat Company, et al.

Defense Verdict.

Psyche Systems Corporation v. Marvin I. Retsky, M.D. dba TMI Pathology Associates, Inc.

Demand to client was 166K, arbitration award was for 17K against client.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2004

University of San Diego School of Law

JD

2000

Loyola Marymount University

BS

Speaking Engagements

2014

Trial Attorneys of America Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois

"Social Media Discovery, Collection & Admissibility"

2013

Trial Attorneys of America Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois

"Spoliation of Evidence: When to Cry Over Spilled Milk"

Publications

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution