Mick Levin

Mick Levin

4.6
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 23 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Insurance, Medical Malpractice, Unknown

3336 N 32nd St Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ

About Mick

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Personal Injury 65%

Mr. Levin is experienced in all aspects of personal injury cases, but especially in those cases dealing with the service of alcohol to patrons who hurt others or are hurt themselves. People who serve alcohol are responsible for making sure that intoxicated patrons get home safe. Mr. Levin has successfully prosecuted numerous cases against bars for not serving safe.

65%
Insurance 15%

Whether first or third party claims, Mr. Levin has taken on numerous insurance companies for clients with coverage and valuation disputes including theft, fire, and other damages claims. Mr. Levin has also successfully prosecuted a number of cases against insurance companies when they try to get out of paying innocent victims' claims.

15%
Medical Malpractice 15%

According to a recent study done by the prestigous New England Journal of Medicine, almost 100,000 patients suffer as the result of medical malpractice. Mr. Levin represents victims and their families when something goes wrong during surgery.

15%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Contingency

25%-40%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 23 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Mick Levin PLC

3336 N 32nd St Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ, 85018

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Mick Levin's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.6 /5.0

21 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (21) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | Trustworthiness

Posted by Scott | March 26, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

My appreciation goes out to Mick and his great team.

To whoever is out there that takes the time to read this review. I've known Mick for over 35 years. I was recently in an accident where it wasn't my fault, Mick and his team, went to the fullest extent to help me get back on my feet after this accident. Him and his team did the best job they could, ...and I was very happy with the outcome. So if there's anyone out there that needs a good attorney that goes the extra mile and make sure that you're happy and pleased with his services, hire this Man! Mick and Christy his partner become almost family during the case. They call you and tell you any kind of information that comes in, they send you all the information in the letters in the mail, through email and every way possible. The whole time I was concerned on if I was going to win this case, Mick advised me, you have my word, you are going to be in good hands, and I believe him now. So Mick if you ever do read this thank you again for being the best lawyer, that I could possibly of ever had. I will lead anyone that needs a great lawyer right to you!!!!!!!!!

Posted by anonymous | February 04, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Medical Malpractice

Worse Lawyer I Ever Hired, See Disciplinary CS. NO: 16-0083 See AZ State Bar's Site

Attorney Levin took a serious med malpractice case involving my Mom, who was a victim of gross negligence. One year and 3 months later, she passed; case was amended as wrongful death case. Levin as per the AZ State Bar, Case No: 16-0083, committed ethical violations that damaged our case. As per At...torney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of AZ Supreme Court., Levin was admonished by failing to diligently represent and expedite litigation, intentionally delayed the cases, failing to submit any discovery requests on clients' behalf, and refusing to consult w/or use expert witnesses. Failed to comply w/rules pertaining to discovery & failing to comply w/ CT orders. I learned Defendants had Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Adjudication, which needed action! Called Levin, he stated that I should allow dismissal, “without prejudice”, meaning, at a later date, it could be filed again. Means starting from square one!. Defendants' Motions contend that Dismissal should be granted because of “lack of prosecution”. Their Motion was alluding to the fact that nothing was being done on my case. I called AZ State Bar, filed formal complaint against Levin. He was angry for contacting them, and immediately filed Court Order to withdrew as attorney of record, which was later granted. Therefore, I went in Pro-Per to CT Hearing, alone, without any representation, to stop Dismissal from being granted. I stood before Judge and to the right of me, were 3 high-powered lawyers, representing the physicians,the defendants in the case. Motion to Dismiss was to be heard during this CT Appearance. Judge denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and issued an Order permitting me 90 days in which to seek another Attorney and to hire medical expert witnesses, so that these witnesses’ certifications and merits of affidavits, which were required a year or more ago, would FINALLY get completed and filed into the CT. 90 days is a short time-period to hire another attorney, have new lawyer review court records, and hire med expert witnesses.I was having difficulty with Levin, getting all records & docs that belonged in my case file. Early on, Levin in emails to me claimed he had excellent expert witnesses aboard that would help us, but then later, after approx. 2 years passed, he claims witnesses no longer aboard; I’ll never actually know if he truly had expert med witnesses, There was absolutely NOTHING in my file after I left, showing that he spoke to ANY witnesses, no affidavits of merit from them, no attorney notes or communication, no contact information, NOTHING!! This is what our entire case hinged upon – expert witnesses! Meanwhile, AZ State Bar was conducting their investigation, which took more than a year to complete. After investigation,AZ State Bar Discipline Probable Cause Committee of Supreme CT, entered the Order of Admonition, Probation, (LOMAP and CLE, and costs) against Levin.It stated that Levin violated ER 1.3, ER 3.2, ER 3.4(c), ER 8.4(d) and Rule 54 (c). As per violations, he “failed to diligently represent and expedite litigation, and violated those rules in part by intentionally delaying the cases, failing to submit any discovery requests on his clients’ behalf, and refusing to consult with or use expert witnesses that his client suggested”. I tried calling one attorney after another, for months, but no attorney likes taking a damaged case from a previous attorney who did no depositions, no interrogatories, no affidavits, no declarations. After years, witnesses can't be found, a case gets "stale". The SOL time-period has since passed; it can't be refiled. Still grieving for Mom, and dismayed as to what happened. I suffered extreme grief and agonizing misery, but I'm grateful for efforts by the Arizona State Bar. They truly care about the citizens of AZ. I hope others never have to experience what I experienced throughout this ordeal.

Mick Levin

Replied last February 04, 2018

Dear Anonymous Client: I, too, am very sorry about what happened to your mom. I feel that she did not get appropriate medical care and I was willing to spend my own time and over $10,000.00 of my own money prosecuting your mother's case. It is a shame we were not able to get justice for her. Unfortunately, the rest of your post is misleading and, at times, simply incorrect. The Arizona State Bar Association has never disciplined me. While you did file a complaint, there is no record of discipline for me on the Arizona State Bar's website. You can go to www.azbar.org, put in my name under "Find a Lawyer," and see for yourself. Under "discipline" it says "none". Also, you appear to question whether I obtained any expert opinions in your mom's case. I did. No, the opinions were not in writing. We do not get them in writing until we have all of the facts. That way, if new information changes the expert's opinion, the expert doesn't look like a liar for changing his mind. Unfortunately, also as you indicated, after we began the case, the expert changed his mind. So, yes, I did obtain an expert and I am pretty sure the Arizona State Bar Association would have sanctioned me for lying to you about it if I hadn't. As you indicated in your post, without an expert, the case would not succeed. You are right, I did advise you to dismiss the case without prejudice so that we could take a step back, regroup, and bring the case again with a new expert. As you correctly point out, it is not easy to get a new expert in 90 days - but that's all the time we had to do it. If the case were dismissed without prejudice, as I advised you, it would have given me more time to find a new expert who would support the case and bring the matter again. I was not angry when you contacted the State Bar - just sad. Usually, when a client feels the need to contact the State Bar because of something their lawyer did or didn't do, it's because the relationship between lawyer and client is irretrievably broken. If things are that bad, it's not exactly a situation a lawyer wants to stay in. Like with any relationship, when someone calls the police on you, it's time to end the relationship. So, no, I wasn't angry - just sad that I wouldn't be able to help get justice for your mother. I don't know why you believe you had a hard time getting records and documents from your case file. I sent everything to you - as well as the State Bar after you made your complaint. They didn't seem to think I had omitted anything. I'm not sure why you believed otherwise. Look, I get it. Your mom had poor medical care; you wanted to sue the people who were responsible; and when the lawsuit came apart, you wanted someone to blame. My best advice is don't be mad at someone who is trying to help you. Yeah, there are scumbag lawyers out there who have stolen their client's money and used their position to their own advantage. All I ever did was try to help and give you the best advice I could. I certainly understand why you're angry - I just don't understand why you're angry at the only person you could find who was willing to take on the case. I'm very sorry that things didn't go the way you wanted them to. Perhaps, if there is ever a next time, you'll try following the advice of your lawyer before reporting him to the Bar. You may be surprised - your lawyer might actually know what he's talking about. Mick

Posted by Linda | February 28, 2016 | Hired Attorney

I had found the best attorney.

I couldn’t believe I would find an attorney like Mick Levin. I knew I found the best attorney for my case the moment I met him. Mick took the most difficult, trying time in my life and gave me empathy and support. He worked my case with a superior level of integrity and professional ethics. I am s...o grateful.

Posted by Melissa | January 26, 2014 | Spinal Cord Injury

Great Lawyer

Mick is a great lawyer. He worked hard to get me the money I needed for my spinal injury. He is a friendly trust worthy lawyer. He is aggressive against the opposition, he is fighting for you.

See All Client Reviews

Mick Levin's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Mick
Sven K Budge headshot
Sven Budge

Personal injury lawyer | Sep 23

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. I worked with Mick on several matters and have known him for years. He is a very knowledgeable and professional attorney. I recommend his services."

John Michael Phillips headshot
John Phillips

Unknown lawyer | Jun 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Lawyers who spend time, pro bono, assisting the public on sites like this are rare. It's important to give back and it's good to see lawyers like you who do. You get my endorsement for sure."

Shane L Harward headshot
Shane Harward

Personal injury lawyer | Oct 01

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mick is an incredibly likeable, hard-working, and intelligent attorney. He has a consistent record of success for injury victims on extremely difficult cases that many attorneys wouldn't even consider getting involved. He excels at intentional torts, e.g. assaults, and dram shop incidents. Calling some of his work on Damron, Helme, and Peaton agreements and insurance assignments brilliant would be an understatement."

John M Curtin headshot
John Curtin

Medical malpractice lawyer | May 30

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mick is one of the smartest and hardest working lawyers in our community. He is creative in his approach and gets excellent results. I have referred cases to Mick, and worked with him as co-counsel. I have no hesitation in recommending him."

Christopher J Zachar headshot
Christopher Zachar

Personal injury lawyer | May 22

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mick fights hard for his clients. I endorse this lawyer."

Peter Thomas Donovan headshot
Peter Donovan

Personal injury lawyer | May 22

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Mick for several years and he is a good friend and an excellent attorney. We have worked on several cases together where his knowledge, skill and insight was invaluable to the case. He has also been kind enough to provide advice to me on other cases. He knows personal injury and insurance issues inside and out and I certainly endorse him."

Geoffrey Trachtenberg headshot
Geoffrey Trachtenberg

Personal injury lawyer | May 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Xavier Alex Carpio headshot
Xavier Carpio

Personal injury lawyer | Jul 12

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mr. Levin is aggressive and experienced. He puts his clients' interests first. Very smart and a great litigator."

View All Endorsements
Sven K Budge headshot
Sven Budge

Personal injury lawyer

Kevin M Garrison headshot
Kevin Garrison

Personal injury lawyer

John M Curtin headshot
John Curtin

Medical malpractice lawyer

Peter Thomas Donovan headshot
Peter Donovan

Personal injury lawyer

Christopher J Zachar headshot
Christopher Zachar

Personal injury lawyer

Geoffrey Trachtenberg headshot
Geoffrey Trachtenberg

Personal injury lawyer

Xavier Alex Carpio headshot
Xavier Carpio

Workers compensation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Honors

2012

Sponsor - Trial Advocacy Conference, Arizona Association of Justice

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Attorney, Mick Levin, PLC

Associations

2022 - Present

Southwest Super Lawyers

2003 - Present

Arizona Association for Justice

American Bar Association

American Board of Trial Advocates

Arizona Association for Justice

Arizona Bar Association

Maricopa Bar Association

National Crime Victims Bar Association

Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Law Update 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019

Pre-Trial Pleadings 2019

Sample of Legal Cases

AMEX v. Sisler

The jury determined that AMEX Assurance Company breached the homeowner's insurance contract and comitted bad faith resulting in a verdict in favor of Mr. Sisler

Trejo v. Taps

Settlement in excess of $1,000,000.00

Etcitty v. State of Arizona

$3 Million Awarded In Damages.

Hays v. Hays

$2.7 Million Awarded In Damages.

Sisler v. Amex Assurance Company

$1.2 Million Awarded In Damages.

Guerra v. City of Tempe

$152,355.05 Awarded In Damages.

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

Arizona State University

Speaking Engagements

N/A

Arizona Association for Justice, Continuing Legal Education Committee

Reasonable attorney fees

N/A

Arizona Association for Justice, Continuing Legal Education Committee

Dram Shop law

Publications

2018

Personal Injury Damages 2018 Personal Injury Damages 2018

2017

Bar and Restaurant Liability 2017 Bar and Restaurant Liability 2017

2015

The Role of the Ethical Rules in Legal Malpractice Cases 2015 The Role of the Ethical Rules in Legal Malpractice Cases 2015

2013

Ethics Seminar: Reasonableness of Attorney Fees AzAJ 2013 Ethics Seminar: Reasonableness of Attorney Fees AzAJ 2013

2013

Damron and Beyond: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly AzAJ 2013 Damron and Beyond: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly AzAJ 2013

2012

When Husband Sues Wife AzAJ 2012 When Husband Sues Wife AzAJ 2012

2012

Dramshop basics AzAJ 2012 Dramshop basics AzAJ 2012

2004

Insurance Coverage for Mold Claims 2004 Insurance Coverage for Mold Claims 2004

2003

Application of the Intentional Acts Exclusion 2003 Application of the Intentional Acts Exclusion 2003

2002

Model Prevention and Remedy of Erroneous Convictions Act 2002 Model Prevention and Remedy of Erroneous Convictions Act 2002

2001

Arizona State Law Journal Actual Innocence

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution