Bernard Van O'Steen Jr

Bernard Van O'Steen Jr

also known as Van O'Steen

5.0
Rating: 9.9

Licensed for 53 years

Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Personal Injury, Business

300 W Clarendon Ave Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ

About Bernard

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 350-400 per hour

Contingency

29%-40%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 53 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 1972

Active

No misconduct found

Location

O'Steen & Harrison, PLC

300 W Clarendon Ave Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013-3424

O'Steen & Harrison, PLC

17235 N. 75th Ave., Suite E-110, Glendale, AZ, 85308

O'Steen & Harrison, PLC

Building 3, Suite 111, 1757 E. Baseline Rd., Gilbert, AZ, 85233

Van O'Steen, Attorneys at Law

2033 E. Speedway Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85719

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Bernard Van O'Steen Jr's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Wills & Living Wills

Posted by Dave Silliman | June 22, 2011 | Wills & Living Wills

Van handles everything for us.

I am a business owner, and Van has been handling all of my legal needs for 35 years. Although he is well known as a personal injury attorney, over the years he's done everything for us: wills, divorces, formed corporations, and has defended us in several personal property damage cases, none of which ...we have ever lost. His staff is excellent, and his experience, negotiation skills and advice have been beneficial to us and our business on many occasions. The best recommendation I could provide for Van: I trust the man. Period.

See All Client Reviews

Bernard Van O'Steen Jr's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Bernard
Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Personal injury lawyer | May 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Bernard. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Jeffrey M. Freedman headshot
Jeffrey Freedman

Personal injury lawyer | Jun 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"My law practice is in Buffalo, N.Y., and I know who to call when my clients need a personal injury lawyer in Arizona. Van O'Steen is among the very best and brightest lawyers I know. I highly recommend him and his law firm."

Charles R Calleros headshot
Charles Calleros

Personal injury lawyer | Jun 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Van O’Steen has devoted his career to providing excellent legal representation and access to justice for all. A frequent guest lecturer in the law school’s courses on professional responsibility, O’Steen’s integrity and values are of the highest caliber. He combines a keen knowledge of the legal system with empathy and experience. When any victim of personal injury asks me to recommend an attorney, Van O’Steen is the first name I give."

Paul D Friedman headshot
Paul Friedman

Personal injury lawyer | Jun 21

Relationship: Co-worker

"Van O'Steen has been a diligent attorney on behalf of injured and impoverished clients for over 30 years. He has been an asset to the legal community providing training to other attorneys in marketing and handling product liability cases throughout the country."

View All Endorsements
Chase W. Rasmussen headshot
Chase Rasmussen

Car accident lawyer

Steven L Reed headshot
Steven Reed

Personal injury lawyer

Jeffrey M. Freedman headshot
Jeffrey Freedman

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.9 (Superb)

Honors

2011

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2002

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2001

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2000

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1999

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1998

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1985

Founding Fellow, Arizona Foundation for Legal Services and Education

1972

Cum Laude, Arizona State University College of Law

1971

Associate Editor, Arizona State Law Journal

N/A

Who's Who in American Law, Who's Who In American Law

N/A

Distinguished Alumnus Award, Arizona State University College of Law

N/A

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

Work Experience

2004 - Present

Founding Partner, O'Steen & Harrison, PLC

1980 - 2004

Founding Partner, Van O'Steen and Partners

1974 - 1977

Founder, O'Steen Legal Clinic

1972 - 1974

Staff Attorney, Maricopa County Legal Aid Society

Associations

1978 - Present

State Bar of Arizona

Member, Various Committees

1978 - Present

American Trial Lawyers Association

Member

1975 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1972 - Present

State Bar of Arizona

Member

American Bar Association, Consortium on Legal Services and the Public

Member

1983 - 1986

American Bar Association, Special Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services

Chairperson

1982 - 1983

American Bar Association, Special Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services

Member

1979 - 1980

American Legal Clinic Association

President

1974 - 1977

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest

Founding Director

Sample of Legal Cases

State of Arizona v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., et al.

$3.1 billion settlement for Arizona taxpayers

Bates and O'Steen v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977)

The United States Supreme Court declared unconstitutional Arizona's rule prohibiting all lawyer advertising.

Parness v. The City of Tempe, 123 Ariz. 461 (Ariz.App. 1979)

Settlement following successful appeal to the Arizona Court of Appeals.

Culbertson v. Leland, 528 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1975)

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declared unconstitutional Arizona's Innkeeper's Lien Statute.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1972

Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor, cum laude

1968

California Western University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2010

Professional Responsibility (Course)

Lawyer Advertising and Legal Ethics

2004

Commencement, Arizona State University College of Law

Commencement Keynote Speaker

Publications

2005

Arizona State Law Journal Bates v. State Bar of Arizona: The Personal Account of a Party and the Consumer Benefits of Lawyer Advertising

1998

The Arizona Republic and Twelve Other Arizona Newspapers Legal Advice Columns

1971

Law and the Social Order State Denials of Unemployment Insurance Benefits to Persons Who Limit Their Employment Possibilities by Wearing Long Hair

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution