Jerry D Worsham II

Jerry D Worsham II

5.0
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 36 years

Environmental and natural resources Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Environmental and Natural Resources, Real Estate, Corporate & Incorporation

1850 North Central Avenue, STE 2400, Phoenix, AZ

About Jerry

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 29 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1996

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Licensed in Arizona for 31 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 1994

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 36 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1990

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in New Mexico for 36 years

State: New Mexico

Acquired: 1989

Active

No misconduct found

Location

The Cavanagh Law Firm

1850 North Central Avenue, STE 2400, Phoenix, AZ, 85004

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jerry D Worsham II's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

14 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (14) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Steve | May 01, 2013 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Great Lawyer!

Jerry's has the knowledge and experience to deal with complex issues. His ability to breakdown an issue and explain in lay terms the approach to solve the problem is great comfort. His ability to settle without great expense is a rare attribute in the legal profession.

Posted by Martin | May 01, 2013 | Environmental and Natural Resources

Excellent Lawyer

Jerry D. Worsham II is very knowledgeable in his field of Enviromental issues, he is also very trustworthy and keeps you in the loop on progress being made and an excellent communications. From my experience I would highly recommend him if you have an issue in this field.

See All Client Reviews

Jerry D Worsham II's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jerry
Paul M. Bohannon headshot
Paul Bohannon

Environmental and natural resources lawyer | Dec 04

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. I have worked with Jerry on many matters. He is aggressive yet gracious. He knows the law."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

2017

Top Attorneys in the Southwest, Super Lawyers Magazine

2015

Sustaining Member, Arizona's Finest Lawyers

2015

Top Lawyer, Who's Who Legal

2010

Arizona Top Lawyers, Ranking Arizona

2008

Top Lawyers in Arizona, AZ Business Magazine

1989

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Member/Partner, Cavanagh Law Firm

2012 - 2015

Partner, Ridenour Hienton & Lewis, PLLC

1999 - 2012

Partner, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

1998 - 1999

Senior Member, O'connor Cavanagh Anderson Westover Killingsworth & Beshears

1996 - 1998

Associate, Andrews & Kurth

1995 - 1996

Vice President/General Counsel, World Resources Company

1990 - 1994

Counsel, Phelps Dodge Corporation

1989 - 1990

Associate, Hinkle Cox Eaton Coffield & Hensley

Associations

1996 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Attorney Member

1994 - Present

State Bar of Arizona

Attorney Member

1994 - Present

Maricopa County Bar Association

Attorney Member

1990 - Present

Bar Association of the District of Columbia

Attorney Member

1989 - Present

New Mexico State Bar

Attorney Member

1989 - Present

American Bar Association

Attorney Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Donathan v. Intel Corp. et al., NO. D-101-CV-2012-0229, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, COUNTY OF SANTA FE

My Client was dismissed with prejudice from the significant damage claims presented by Plaintiif's counsel.

Town of Gilbert v. William Carpenter CR2245 MI , Municipal Court Town of gilbert

Charges dismissed

State of Arizona v. Hasa, Inc. CV99-01344 Superior Court of Arizona

Matter dismissed with public outreach program.

CALPERS v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co. et al. Case No SA CV 99-262 United States District Court District of California

Client settled out as a de minimis party

Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project, NO 2:10-00290 in the United States District court , District of Arizona

Clients dismissed from the Amended Complaint.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1988

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1982

Pepperdine University

M.B.A.,

1978

Cornell College

B.S.S

Speaking Engagements

2013

Real Estate Law-Advanced Issues and Answers

Environmental Issues in Real Estate Law

2011

The Environmental Appeals Process:What you Should Know

Environmental Enforcement

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution