Vincent N. Rahaman

Vincent N. Rahaman

4.2
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 29 years

Bankruptcy and debt Lawyer at Colorado Springs, CO
Practice Areas: Bankruptcy & Debt, Divorce & Separation, Family, Juvenile

405 S. Cascade Ave., Suite 103, Colorado Springs, CO

About Vincent

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 125-295 per hour

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Colorado for 29 years

State: Colorado

Acquired: 1996

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Vincent Rahaman, Attorney At Law, PC

405 S. Cascade Ave., Suite 103, Colorado Springs, CO, 80903

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Vincent N. Rahaman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

10 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (10) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | Case Results

Posted by Elisabeth | December 18, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Excellent lawyer and kind demeanor

Vince represented me in my divorce that was final 1.5 years ago. He and his staff were thorough, responsive, and also kind during what is such a stressful time. Since the divorce he has been helpful to answer questions as they have come up about custody issues. I would use him again in a heartbeat!

Posted by anonymous | April 07, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Family

Disapointed

Attorney knowledgeable, but not suited for family law. I found him to be highly intimidated by the presiding judge. The outcome was extremely disappointing.

Posted by Randy | March 27, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody

Home State Jursidiction

Vince, Your amazing! Ok folks here is the low down of my case. I hired Mr. Rahaman to get custody of my son Mathew..(he has lived with me for over 3 years. Let me start with his office crew. The ladies in his office ROCK! They were always informed of my case and kept me informed. They were always p...rofessional when dealing with me. They took all of my concerns and questions and expedited them to Vince and got me a response almost immediately. WELL DONE! So upon Vince taking my case on he sat down and explained everything thoroughly. He made sure he had the right legal reference material out at every meeting so that he could show me what each statue reads. We went to court ready to fight for jurisdiction. Upon entering court the judge heard both parties. Unfortunately he did not rule in our favor. Vince and I believe that the judge did get this one wrong. We have talked several times about the case. Although we lost we have still succeeded. My son is still going to stay here with me. I want to thank Mr. Rahaman and his entire staff for everything they have done. To whom ever finds themselves reading this if you want a motivated team that supports and defends your every need you must hire Vince. You will not go wrong. You will be happy with his services. It was a absolute pleasure working with him. He will get the results you desire. He is highly intelligent and loyal. He is a pit-bull when needed. I can not speak highly enough about this team. What a blessing he has been.

Posted by anonymous | March 05, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Divorce Court

From the onset, I found Mr. Rahaman to show extreme intimidation by the judges. His being intimidated severely compromised my case and ultimately had catastrophic affects on my case. He was very passive during testimony as not to perturb the judge. It was a very upsetting outcome.

Vincent Rahaman

Replied last March 05, 2017

This client's case was a marriage of 24 years with a significant difference in income between the client and his wife. I have a duty of candor to a client. I advised this client that Colorado law requires in divorce cases that judges use/refer to formulas to divide pensions and calculate spousal support, which is exactly what the Court did at this client's hearing. In dividing the client/spouses's marital assets, the difference between what we asked the court to order versus what the court ordered was 2%. In awarding spousal support to the client's spouse, the client ended up with 57% of the parties combined income, while his spouse had 43%. While I understand that spousal support and pension divisions in divorce cases are sensitive topics for some individuals, the client's description of the case outcome should be more accurately described as the Court doing that which law required.

See All Client Reviews

Vincent N. Rahaman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Vincent

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Associations

El Paso County Bar Association, Family Law Section

Colorado Bar Association, Family Law Section

American Bar Association, Family Law Section

National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys

Education

1994

Thomas Cooley

JD

N/A

Gonazaga University

M.B.A.

N/A

Our Lady of the Lake University

B.A.S.

N/A

Regina Mundi College

High School Diploma

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution