People v. Dye, Adams County District Court
Jan 29, 2013OUTCOME: Judgment Reversed
DUI conviction reversed and case remanded for new trial because county court erred in denying motion for suppression.
Lakewood, CO
Appeals Lawyer at Lakewood, CO
Practice Areas: Appeals, Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Judgment Reversed
DUI conviction reversed and case remanded for new trial because county court erred in denying motion for suppression.
OUTCOME: Judgment Affirmed
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that a criminal defendant has a right under Crim. P. 32(d) to move to withdraw a guilty plea to a deferred judgment.
OUTCOME: Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and case remanded with directions
The Court of Appeals ruled that a criminal defendant has a right to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his trial attorney incorrectly advised him of the deadline to file a petition for postconvic ... tion relief to preserve his right to pursue federal habeas corpus relief.
OUTCOME: Judgment Affirmed
OUTCOME: Motion Granted in Part and Denied in Part
OUTCOME: Judgment Reversed
OUTCOME: Petition for Postconviction Relief Granted
The county court found that Mr. Santillan-Villagomez was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel by his attorney's failure to advise him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea.
OUTCOME: Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted
The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari on the following issue: Whether a criminal defendant has the right to apply for post-conviction review of a deferred judgment pursuant to section 18-1-4 ... 10, C.R.S. (2010) and Crim. P. 35(c).
OUTCOME: Judgment of Conviction Reversed.
OUTCOME: Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted
The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari on the following issues: Whether a public university’s investigation of a tenured professor’s work product can constitute an adverse employment acti ... on for the purposes of a First Amendment claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when, as a result of the investigation, the tenured professor also experiences adverse employment action in the form of termination. Whether the granting of quasi-judicial immunity to the Regents of the University of Colorado for their termination of a tenured professor comports with federal law for actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Whether the denial of equitable remedies for termination in violation of the First Amendment undermines the purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.