I contacted Mr. Lilly when I got served by one of my creditors for non-payment. He immediately put my mind at ease, pointing out that there was plenty of time to negotiate and to avoid having to appear in court. He ended up getting a very manageable payment plan from the creditor. I was amazed at how much he got done in just a few hours. Overall, a very good experience!
In addition to several years of litigation experience in federal and state courts, Brett served as a judicial clerk for a Colorado Supreme Court Justice and three District Court Judges.
Brett litigated Benefield v. Colorado Republican Party, 329 P.3d 262 (Colo. 2014), holding that the Colorado Open Records Act mandates an award of costs and reasonable attorney fees in favor of any person who applies for and receives an order from the district court requiring a custodian to permit inspection of a public record. Additionally, Brett litigated Weise v. Casper, 593 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 2010), affirming the grant of qualified immunity for ejecting plaintiffs from a presidential speech. Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court. Weise v. Casper, 131 S. Ct. 7 (2010).
Among other cases, Brett also litigated Red Flower, Inc. v. McKown, ___ P.3d ___ (Colo. App. 2016) and Slater Numismatics, LLC v. Driving Force, LLC, 310 P.3d 185 (Colo. App. 2012). Recently, Brett published Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations in Colorado, 54 The Colorado Lawyer 65 (July, 2016).
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
| Hired Attorney
Helped me tremendously with a debt
I contacted Mr. Lilly when I got served by one of my creditors for non-payment. He immediately put my mind at ease, pointing out that there was plenty of time to negotiate and to avoid having to appear in court. He ended up getting a very manageable payment plan from the creditor. I was amazed at how much he got done in just a few hours. Overall, a very good experience!
Read less
Cost
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.
What determines Avvo Rating?
Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
Discipline
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.