State v. Deborah D...
Nov 07, 2012OUTCOME: Deborah was placed on Pre-Trial Diversion and the case was ultimately dismissed.
Deborah was charged with the felony offense of possession of marijuana.
Amarillo, TX
Criminal defense Lawyer at Amarillo, TX
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Deborah was placed on Pre-Trial Diversion and the case was ultimately dismissed.
Deborah was charged with the felony offense of possession of marijuana.
OUTCOME: John was placed on Pre-Trial Diversion and the felony case was ultimately dismissed.
John was charged with the felony offense of money laundering.
OUTCOME: Case was dismissed.
Dennis was charged with the felony offense of possession of marijuana.
OUTCOME: Court granted defense Motion to Suppress Evidence & the State dismissed the case.
Marcus was charged with the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance.
OUTCOME: Case dismissed and the $32,000.00 was returned to Ryan.
Ryan was charged with the criminal offense of money laundering. The State of Texas seized $32,000.00 and filed a forfeiture action seeking to forfeit the money to the State.
OUTCOME: Case was dismissed.
Ryan was charged with the felony offense of money laundering.
OUTCOME: Case was reduced to a Class A Misdemeanor.
Peter was charged with the First Degree felony offense of possession of a controlled substance.
OUTCOME: Case was dismissed.
Christina was charged with the felony offense of possession of marijuana.
OUTCOME: Case was dismissed.
Matthew was charged with the felony offense of possession of marijuana.
OUTCOME: Case was dismissed and the $45,000.00 was returned to Enea.
Enea was charged with the criminal offense of money laundering. The State of Texas seized $45,000.00 and filed a forfeiture action seeking to forfeit the money to the State.