Jack Lewis Siegel

Jack Lewis Siegel's Legal Cases (47)

Austin, TX

Employment and labor Lawyer at Austin, TX

Practice Areas: Employment & Labor

Message View Profile
Message View Profile
Government

Patect, LLC v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented non-practicing entity in qui tam litigation, consulted with department of justice for settlement approval, and obtained favorable settlement for client.

Litigation

Tex Pat v. Donaldson Company, Inc., 5:10-cv-144-DF (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Global Settlement Regarding All Products

Represented company in allegations involving the commercialization of filtration systems.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. Otto Bock Healthcare GmbH, 5:11-cv-7 (E.D. 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented company against prosthetics, orthodontics and mobility manufacturer.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. Flowserve Corp., et al., 5:10-cv-197-TJW (E.D. Tex 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution

Represented company for claims against worldwide leader in flow cost control mechanisms for desalination plants.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. Integra LifeSciences Holdings, Corp., 5:11-cv-11-TJW (E.D. Tex 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

Represented company in federal court against Fortune 500 company and surgical products leader.

Litigation

Tex Pat v. Vishay Technologies, Inc., 5:11-cv-10 (E.D. Tex 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented company in litigation against leading semi-conductor manufacturer.

Litigation

Patect, LLC v. Panasonic Corp. of North America, 5:10-cv-152-DF (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

Represented relator in whistleblower action stemming from false marking violation.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. Lonza Ltd., et al., 5:10-cv-232-DF (E.D. Tex. 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented company against microbial control manufacturing company in federal court.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. Agilent Technologies, Inc., et al., 5:10-cv-146 (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented company against technology corporation in federal court matter involving commercialization of products.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. United Technologies Corp., et al., 5:10-cv-186-DF-CMC (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented company against technology and aerospace manufacturing leader regarding product manufacture.

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
Learn More About the Avvo Rating