Jack Lewis Siegel

Jack Lewis Siegel's Legal Cases (47)

Austin, TX

Employment and labor Lawyer at Austin, TX

Practice Areas: Employment & Labor

Message View Profile
Message View Profile
Commercial real estate

Haywood v. Univesity of Pittsburgh, 11-cv-1200 (W.D. PA 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Substantial Settlement for Client

Firm represented client in federal court case involving breach of contract allegatons against major public university for firing of head coach.

Personal injury

Charles Simmons, et. al., v. Chevron Corporation, et al. (Contra Costa County, CA)

N/A

OUTCOME: Ongoing Litigation Due to Case Logistics (6,000+ clients)

Represented approximately 6,000 individuals in mass toxic tort suit arising from refinery explosion at Chevron Richmond Refinery in August 2012.

Litigation

Erin Dauer, et al. v. Stanley Marsh III, et al. (Potter County, TX)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement Benefitting Clients

Representation of clients who were allegedly drugged and molested by eccentric billionaire and Cadillac Ranch owner, Stanley Marsh III.

Litigation

Tex Pat, LLC v. Sensata Technologies Massachussets, Inc., 5:10-cv-131-DF-CMC

N/A

OUTCOME: Substantial Confidential Global Settlement Benefitting Client

Provided co-lead counsel to corporate client in high-stakes intellectual property and whistleblower matter in federal court. Filed oppositions to motions to dismiss and motions to transfer venue agains ... t Defendant represented by litigation boutique powerhouse Sussman Godfrey, leading to substantial settlement for client.

Litigation

Tex Pat v. Merck KGaA, et al., 5:11-cv-2-DF (E.D. Tex 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Represented company in case against leading pharmaceutical manufacturer.

Litigation

Patect, LLC v. Mattel Inc., et al, 5:10-cv-74-DF (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

Litigated complex litigation case in Federal District Court for Eastern District of Texas involving complex commercial and intellectual property issues.

Intellectual property

Patect, LLC v. Sealed Air Corporation, et al., 5:10-cv-148 (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

Lawsuit against pioneer of 2D bar code technology in federal court.

Commercial real estate

Patect, LLC v. Perfect Pushup, LLC, 5:10-cv-76-DF (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

Lawsuit against innovative manufacturer for deceptive practices involving fitness products.

Litigation

Patect, LLC v. Nisus Corp. 5:10-cv-90-DF (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

Lawsuit against pesticide leader for deceptive practices involving patent portfolio.

Government

Patect, LLC v. Exclusive Imports, Inc., et al, 2010-cv-72-DF (E.D. Tex 2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable Resolution for Client

Contentious federal court matter involving whistleblower allegations against corporation specializing in supplying businesses with office supplies.

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
Learn More About the Avvo Rating