This lawyer cannot be reviewed
Paul V. Simon

Paul V. Simon

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 25 years

Commercial real estate Lawyer at Houston, TX
Practice Areas: Commercial, Appeals, Litigation

2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 800, Houston, TX

About Paul

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 450-750 per hour

Contingency

25%-45%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 25 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2000

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

Pendergraft & Simon, LLP

2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 800, Houston, TX, 77019

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Paul V. Simon's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

10 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (10) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 6 - 10 of 10 reviews

Posted by Ken | April 29, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Officer Representation, Settlement Negotiations & Agreement

I became acquainted with Paul as he was engaged by my business partner (and fellow officer in our corporation), to represent him in a suit. The suit was as a result of the plaintiffs choosing to join the officers in addition to their alleged claims against our companies. It was particularly offensi...ve with DTPA claims which were false - and the inclusion of many parties that simply had no involvement with any of the facts and circumstances. Our D&O provider placed a limitation on the number of counselors our policy would be able to cover. My partner and I chose a common sense approach of instructing my own counselor (engaged in my capacity as an Officer) to attempt to work collaboratively with Paul on a solution which was amenable to the insurer and their limits of coverage, while ensuring that work done by Paul was not wasted or not leveraged for the benefit of the end goal - making the suit go away. I was genuinely impressed by both men's capacity to put the client first and find a solution which was a win:win to their needs an in line with the insurer's requirements. It would have been perfectly easy for all involved to look out after their own interests, fees, etc. - none of that happened. Subsequent to all of this, our corporate counselors who were engaged in this matter by being uniquely qualified to have a local feel of the lay of the land in South Texas, needed more detailed contractual support which was comparatively much more of Paul's expertise. I witnessed again, what could otherwise be a herd of cats (legal cats that is), be artfully managed and effectively shepherded by Paul in a way that was amenable to everyone. There was no offense taken by any of the parties, no extraneous waste of time and dollars. Paul wound up expertly completing the task of an effective settlement agreement with the Plaintiffs who were particularly challenging with a series of back and forth(s) which became tedious and at times seemingly counterproductive. In the end, the agreement absolved our companies - and each of us in our capacity as officers. I believe that Paul's tough but fair minded pragmatic style enabled a settlement with the plaintiff - saving our company, our insurer, and moreover everyone's time which is valuable. Paul is precise and appropriately respects the importance of both accuracy of facts and personal nuances of the parties involved.

Posted by Andy | December 12, 2014 | Employment & Labor

Employment Contract Dispute

Mr. Simon assisted me with settling an employment contract dispute with a previous employer of mine in a swift, and professional manner. He was helpful and consistent in every way possible. Mr. Simon displayed an extremely high quality of character and honor during my time working with him. Mr. Simon... is, in my opinion, in the upper echelon of attorneys in the country. I will highly recommend his services in the future.

Posted by Susie | June 06, 2014 | Divorce & Separation

The Case of the Divorce, Foreclosure, Excess Proceeds and the New Ex-Wife!

When I divorced in 1988, my ex-husband got our marital home as part of the property settlement and I signed a Quit Claim Deed in his favor (although he never recorded it). In December, 2010 (22+ years after our divorce) I learned that my ex-husband had let the property go into foreclosure. Because ...he had never re-financed, I will still a co-borrower on the mortgage and a co-owner in the Deed records. And, to complicate matters, my ex-husband had since re-married, divorced, and given 1/2 of the property to his new ex-wife in their property settlement. The lender foreclosed, sold the property at auction, and there was a substantial amount of money left over from the sale of the property. Because I had agreed to give my ex-husband the property in our divorce settlement, I was certain I was not entitled to any of the excess funds from the sale of the property. But wait...I was still an owner according to the Deed records. And, I because my credit history was damaged as a result of the lender reporting the foreclosure on my credit report, I felt I should be compensated for my ex-husband's failure to re-finance and/or make the payments on time. And, not being an unreasonable person, I was willing to share the excess funds with my ex-husband's new ex-wife. Paul reviewed my Divorce Decree, determined that my ex-husband was negligent, and successfully argued my case. My ex-husband's new ex-wife and I split the excess proceeds and he got what he deserved...nothing! Paul counseled me as to my options, helped me keep my emotions in check when making decisions, and kept my in the loop throughout the entire process. I had been told by two other attorneys that my case was hopeless and that I should let it go. That's when I contacted Paul. He was honest that it wasn't going to be easy, but he wasn't intimidated by the hard work he knew it was going to take. Paul spent countless hours researching case law and how to successfully present my case. And, he did ALL of this for a very reasonable fee! I reflect back on my case from time to time and I'm still AMAZED at what Paul was able to do with an otherwise hopeless situation. Needless to say, I'm still Paul's #1 fan!

Posted by anonymous | April 17, 2014 | Business

The Victory

This case was a business dispute litigation. Mr. Simon began working on the matter prior to litigation. Mr. Simon quickly and objectively analyzed the facts. Initially, he worked to resolve the differences to avoid litigation. Once the other side filed the lawsuit, Mr. Simon proposed meditation.... His goal was to minimize our legal costs. While the opposing counsel was hostile, Mr. Simon remained professional. When untrue statements were written and asserted to be facts, Mr. Simon wrote articulate replies to opposing counsel’s motions frustrating their efforts to build a non-existent case. When the other side’s Motions were presented in court, the judge consistently, although not always, agreed with Mr. Simon and mostly ruled in our favor. After each loss, opposing counsel was required to amend their petition to remove false claims. Opposing counsel did present and argue a Motion for Summary Judgment. Their MSJ was denied and the other side agreed to mediate. With the mediator’s assistance, Mr. Simon guided us to a successful resolution. Mr. Simon’s expertise and intellectual talent brought to this case is very much appreciate. Paul Simon has our unqualified endorsement.

Posted by Garrett | November 01, 2013

Strong, dedicated and thorough...

Paul went above and beyond my expectations. We had a case that needed immediate attention and he swiftly got up to speed in order to handle the case in a timely manner. During the process he made a point to keep myself, and all involved, informed. If a questions ever needed answering, he was able to ...provide us with answers that could be easily understood. He set us at ease and made us feel confident.

See All Client Reviews

Paul V. Simon's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Paul
David Tang headshot
David Tang

Contracts and agreements lawyer | Dec 04

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse Paul Simon. Paul is incredibly focused, prepared, and knowledgeable."

Kevin R. Pennell headshot
Kevin Pennell

Commercial real estate lawyer | May 02

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have worked with Paul on several different matters over several years. He is first class. I have referred clients to him in the past and will continue to do so in the future."

Benjamin Harwood Rose headshot
Benjamin Rose

Litigation lawyer | May 02

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Paul is an ideal litigator. He not only fiercely represents his clients and pursues multiple avenues to secure the best result, he also is a reasonable adversary who puts his clients interests above any personal concern."

Graham Eugene Sutliff headshot
Graham Sutliff

Personal injury lawyer | Jul 10

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Shane A. McClelland headshot
Shane McClelland

Commercial real estate lawyer | Mar 15

Relationship: Co-worker

"Paul exemplifies all of the best qualities of an attorney. He is honest, thoughtful, insightful, and strategic in his approach to each matter entrusted to him. He also takes a client centered approach that makes his clients feel as though they are part of the process every step of the way. Paul is truly a gifted lawyer, with a sharp and inquisitive legal mind. He has the ability to see through the complications of any given case to find the sure and quick path to resolving the matter in his client's favor. Paul can and will notice problems in a case that may not otherwise be detected. By such foresight, he can solve a problem for his client today, and avoid messy litigation months or years down the road."

View All Endorsements
David (Trey) M. Stiles III headshot
David (Trey) Stiles

Personal injury lawyer

Graham Eugene Sutliff headshot
Graham Sutliff

Personal injury lawyer

Shane A. McClelland headshot
Shane McClelland

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2004

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2003

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2017 - 2018

General Counsel, Jetall Companies

2006 - 2017

Partner, Simon Herbert McClelland & Stiles, LLP

2001 - 2006

Associate, Winstead, PC

2001 - 2001

Briefing Attorney, Houston (14th) Court of Appeals

2000 - 2001

Briefing Attorney, Fourteenth Court Of Appeals

Associations

2013 - Present

Texas Bar Foundation

Sustaining Member

2012 - Present

Houston Bar Association

Fellow

American Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

General Metal Fabricating Corp. v. Stergiou

On second motion for rehearing, reversed and remanded

General Metal Fabricating Corp. v. Stergiou

Appellate court affirmed trial court's summary judgment ruling that Rule 11 agreement was enforceable

Melawer v. Total Aircraft

$82,000 Judgment for client, including $25K in sanctions against attorney and attorney's client for discovery abuses and appellate attorney's fees, etc. Affirmed by court of appeals and 100% recovery against plaintiff/counter-defendant.

Myers v. Keegan

Beaumont Court of Appeals affirmed

Sterling Bank v. Willard M, L.L.C.

Houston court reversed and rendered award of costs against bank

In re Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota N.A.

In case of first impression, Houston court conditionally granted mandamus.

Stergiou v. General Metal Fabricating

Mandamus conditionally granted

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

South Texas College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

University of Houston, main campus

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2016

Houston Bar Association

Annual Harvest Party/Fundraiser Attendee

2015

Houston Bar Association

Annual Harvest Party/Fundraiser Attendee

2014

Houston Bar Association

Annual Harvest Party/Fundraiser Attendee

2013

Houston Bar Association

Annual Harvest Party/Fundraiser Attendee

Publications

2023

South Western Reporter Second Providence Town Square Housing LTD v. Harris County Appraisal Dist.

2017

South Western Reporter Second Marullo v. Apollo Associated Services, LLC

2016

South Western Reporter Second Petroleum Workers Union of the Republic of Mexico v. Gomez

2014

South Western Reporter Second General Metal Fabricating Corp v. Sterigiou

2008

36 ABA Preview, 3, 158-63 Does the Sherman Act Recognize a "Price-Squeezing" Claim Where the Only Duty to Deal Arises from a Regulatory Scheme

2006

South Western Reporter Second Sterling Bank v. Willard M, L.L.C.

2005

18 The Appellate Advocate Pre-Dispute Jury Waivers Now Enforceable in Texas

2003

Houston Chronicle Beware Bait-and-Switch by Prop. 12 Supporters

2000

41 SOUTH TEX. L. REV. 1101 The Fourth Amendment's Exclusionary Rule - Judicial Remedy or Constitutional Mandate: Is There Room for the "Good Faith" Exception?

N/A

2004 HOUS. BUS. J. 26 How Can an Owner Protect its Company from a Jury of its Peers?

Languages

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution