Misty Ann Farris

Misty Ann Farris

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 29 years

Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at Dallas, TX
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Appeals

5473 Blair Road, Dallas, TX

About Misty

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 29 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1996

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

Fears Nachawati

5473 Blair Road, Dallas, TX, 75231

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Misty Ann Farris's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Misty Ann Farris's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Misty
Amy Jill Shahan headshot
Amy Shahan

Appeals lawyer | Jul 08

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I worked with Misty for approximately 10 years in the appellate department at Baron & Budd. Misty was a senior attorney when I started and I could depend on her when I had questions about various issues that came up on a daily basis. Misty can easily pinpoint legal issues that will pose a potential problem, as well as how to address those issues. Misty's writing is seamless and absent the legalese that plagues so much legal briefing. Even though we have not worked in the same office for over 7 years, I can still contact Misty to assist with both small and large legal issues."

Janice Robinson Pennington headshot
Janice Pennington

Appeals lawyer | Jul 08

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"Misty Farris is one of the finest appellate lawyers I know. Misty’s keen analytical skills allow her quickly to fashion or fend off legal arguments, as the need arises. A highly creative thinker, Misty enjoys and excels at developing winning legal strategies. Her passion for her clients infuses everything she writes, resulting in briefs and trial level responses demonstrating not just that her client’s position is the right one, but why. Her written work is the perfect balance of structure and inspiration. At argument or in a hearing, Misty is always prepared, demonstrating a pleasant demeanor whether addressing the court uninterrupted or hopping nimbly from topic to topic in responses to the judges’ questioning. Time and again, her talent, skill, dedication and hard work have paid off in impressive results for Misty's clients in her trial and appellate practice. They are fortunate to have her on their side."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2006

Trial Lawyer of the Year, Public Justice

Work Experience

2018 - Present

Managing Attorney, Fears Nachawati

2014 - 2018

Attorney, Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, PC

2012 - 2016

Online Media Coordinator, Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit

2011 - 2012

Partner, Rosenthal Pennington, LLP

2011 - 2013

Principal, Lawful Speech

2007 - 2010

Of Counsel, Baron & Budd, A Professional Corporation

2003 - 2007

Shareholder, Baron & Budd, A Professional Corporation

1997 - 2003

Associate, Baron & Budd, A Professional Corporation

Associations

1996 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Member

American Association for Justice

Member

Texas Trial Lawyers Association

Member

Dallas Bar Association

Member

Dallas Women Lawyers Association

Member

Dallas Trial Lawyers Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Kinseth v. Weil McLain, 913 N.W.2d 55 (iowa 2018)

Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 855 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2017)

Affirmed by Plaintiff.

Graves v. Riverwood Intern. Corp.

Affirmed for Plaintiff

Cortez ex rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.

Affirmed.

Dow Chem. Co. v. Stephenson

Affirmed.

Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Ayers

Affirmed.

Emery v. Owens-Corning Corp.

Two sentences in the judgment that dealt with the percentage fault of non-party tortfeasors were deleted as surplusage. In all other respects the judgment was affirmed.

Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

Judgment for Plaintiff vacated and remanded.

Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters

Affirmed for Plaintiff.

N. Am. Refractory Co. v. Easter

Affirmed for Plaintiff.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2014

Southern Methodist University, Perkins School of Theology

M.Div.

1996

University of Texas School of Law

Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.)

1988

University of Houston

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2019

Masters of Mass Tort

IVC Filter Update: Panel Discussion

2019

Mass Tort Nexus

Taxotere Litigation Update

2005

Am. Bar Ass’n, Joint Meeting of Occupational Safety & Health Law Committee & Workers’ Compensation Committee

mpact of Administrative Proceedings – Workers' Compensation/OSHA – On Intentional Tort or Related Claims, Panel Discussion

2004

15th Annual TTLA Med. Malpractice Conference

Analytical Gaps: Beyond Daubert

2002

Mealey's Asbestos Bankr. Conference

The Nuts &Bolts of Filing a Bankruptcy Claim

2001

Mealey’s Nat’l Asbestos Litig. Conference

Significant Asbestos Litigation & Analysis of the Appellate Rulings

Publications

2008

SMU Law Review Toxic Torts and Mass Torts

2008

Trial Alternative Theories for Environmental Contamination Cases

2007

SMU Law Review Toxic Torts and Mass Torts

2006

SMU Law Review Toxic Torts and Mass Torts

2005

SMU Law Review Toxic Torts and Mass Torts

2004

SMU Law Review Toxic Torts and Mass Torts

2004

Occupational Safety & Health Law The OSH Act, Workers’ Compensation, & Workplace Tort Liability

2002

Mealey's Asbestos Bankruptcy Report The Nuts & Bolts of Filing a Bankruptcy Claim

2001

Asbestos Columns Applying Texas Premises Liability Law to Asbestos Cases

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution