We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Robert splits his time between developing litigation strategies and trying cases. His experience includes commercial, product liability and toxic tort cases involving personal injury, wrongful death, premises liability, theft of intellectual property, RICO, civil nuisance, land use, and property damage. Working with teams from our local offices in New York, Atlanta, Charleston, Dallas, Austin, St Louis, Los Angeles and San Francisco, he manages to practice literally coast to coast.
To help clients avoid litigation or quickly resolve it when it arises, it is important to understand litigation leverage. The best perspective comes from a combination of courtroom work and client contact. Robert has tried cases all over the country. In, November 2014, he tried a $13 million case with possible punitive damages to a unanimous defense verdict in federal court in Los Angeles. Earlier that year, he tried one in state court for 4 months before receiving a dismissal for his client. In 2013, he received a defense verdict after a 3 month trial and in 2012 a three week trial resulted in a directed verdict in his client’s favor. Despite the courtroom experience, he makes a concerted effort to spend even more time working with clients to avoid litigation, resolve unavoidable cases short of trial and reduce legal costs.
His experience ranges from plaintiff’s work, representing the family of a woman who drowned in an elevator and landowners whose property was affected by a nearby nuisance to the defense of companies who made a variety of products from toys to turbines. He has represented manufacturers of a range of products with potentially harmful ingredients like asbestos, benzene, PCBs, silica and dioxin. He has also tried commercial, product liability, medical malpractice, general negligence, and federal civil rights cases. He also helps clients avoid lawsuits with risk management advice on warnings, warranties, regulations, and post-sale responsibilities.
Robert is licensed in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Illinois and California. He is regularly admitted to handle cases in New York. He takes time to host client and firm educational events at Thackston Farm, a training retreat in East Texas. He believes in educating young attorneys to become “Renaissance Lawyers,” capable in all areas of their practice, especially professionalism. Feel free to ask him for the slides from that presentation.
1
Practice Area
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: New York
Acquired: 2016
No misconduct found
State: Illinois
Acquired: 2014
No misconduct found
State: California
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
State: North Carolina
Acquired: 2007
No misconduct found
State: Texas
Acquired: 1993
No misconduct found
State: Virginia
Acquired: 1987
No misconduct found
4514 Cole Ave Ste 500, Dallas, TX, 75205
Not Yet Reviewed
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2009
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine
2008
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine
2007
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine
N/A
AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®
2003 - Present
Partner, Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP
1996 - 2003
Partner, Jenkens & Gilchrist
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Settled in the second week of trial after Robert Thackston picked jury, opened, and cross examined plaintiff's industrial hygiene expert.
The seven-person jury then returned a unanimous defense verdict for HPTY’s client.
Plaintiff sued over 50 defendants in his complaint. At the time of dismissal, HPTY’s client was the only remaining defendant.
After about four hours of deliberation, the ten woman and two man jury returned a defense verdict for both defendants.
Plaintiff was unable to prove causation.
The jury assigned only 12% liability to HPTY’s client; 5% liability was assigned to Plaintiff.
After two weeks of jury selection, and during opening statements, Plaintiff's counsel agreed to dismiss our client from the case.
Resolved at trial.
Jury awarded $6.5 million in damages to DaimlerChrysler
Dismissed at trial.
Resolved at trial.
Defense verdict in 3 week trial.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2015
"Advanced Cross Examination Techniques for Plaintiff’s Experts in Asbestos Cases"
2014
"The Emerging Lung Cancer Case: An Analysis of Surging Filing Trends, Asbestos Trust Issues and the Modern Causation Case"
2014
“Combating Plaintiffs use of Phantom Impeachment at Trial”
2004
"Cross Examining the Plaintiffs' Expert Witness on Damages"
2003
"Defending Retailers in Asbestos Litigation"
2000
"Cross Examining Plaintiffs' Industrial Hygiene Experts"
2013
2001
1998
English