Heather Bailey New

Heather Bailey New

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 27 years

Appeals Lawyer at Dallas, TX
Practice Areas: Appeals, Litigation

Whitacre Tower - One AT&T Plaza, 208 S. Akard St., Room 3151, Dallas, TX

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: In-House Counsel

About Heather

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 27 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1998

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

AT&T Services, Inc.

Whitacre Tower - One AT&T Plaza, 208 S. Akard St., Room 3151, Dallas, TX, 75202

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Heather Bailey New's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Heather Bailey New's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Heather

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Everett L. New headshot
Everett New

General practice lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2014

Best Lawyers in Dallas, D Magazine

2011

Texas Rising Star, Texas Monthly Magazine

2010

Texas Rising Star, Texas Monthly Magazine

2007

Texas Rising Star, Texas Monthly Magazine

2005

Texas Rising Star, Texas Monthly Magazine

2001

Rising Star, Dallas Association of Young Lawyers

1998

Magna Cum Laude (graduated 3rd in class with 3.87 GPA), Baylor University School of Law

1997

National Semifinalist, American College of Trial Lawyers Mock Trial Competition

1993

Summa Cum Laude, Stephen F. Austin State University

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Assistant Vice President--Senior Legal Counsel, Appeals, AT&T Services, Inc.

2013 - 2016

Partner, Bell Nunnally & Martin, LLP

1999 - 2013

Senior Attorney, Haynes & Boone

1998 - 1999

Briefing Attorney, Supreme Court Of Texas

Associations

2014 - Present

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Foundation

Board of Trustees

2010 - Present

Texas Bar Foundation

Fellow

2002 - Present

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Foundation

Life Founding Fellow

Texas Bar Foundation

2015 - 2015

Texas Bar Foundation

Dallas Nominating Committee

2013 - 2014

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Leadership Class

Class Facilitator/Sponsor

2006 - 2008

Highland Park United Methodist Church

Advisory Council, Child Development Program

2004 - 2006

Dallas Bar Association publications committee

Chair

2004 - 2005

Patrick E. Higginbotham American Inn of Court

Associate

2001 - 2002

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers

Chair, Star Mentoring Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

U.S. ex rel. Harman v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 599 F. App’x 193 (5th Cir. 2015).

Won dismissal of appeal

Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., 735 F.3d 131 (3d Cir. 2013).

Won reversal of summary judgment on CERCLA claims

Kurt Torster v. Panda Energy Mgmt., No. 07-10-0442-CV, 2011 WL 780522 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Mar. 7, 2011, pet. denied).

Won affirmance.

In re Zuffa, LLC, No. 05-08-0666-CV, 262 S.W.3d 446, 2008 WL 3307125 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 31, 2008, orig. proceeding).

Won mandamus and celebrated by watching the UFC fight in Vegas

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

Baylor University School of Law

Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.)

1995

Oxford University

Summer Program

1993

Stephen F. Austin State University

Bachelor of Arts (B.A.)

1992

Harvard University

Summer Program

Speaking Engagements

2011

University of Texas CLE on Mastering the Art of Collecting Debts and Judgments

Calculation of Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest

2011

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Lunch-n-Learn

Mandamus

2010

University of Texas CLE on Mastering the Art of Collecting Debts and Judgments

Formation of the Judgment

2005

State Bar Annual Meeting: Litigation Section

The Charge: Top 5 Things You Need to Know

Publications

2011

University of Texas CLE on Mastering the Art of Collecting Debts and Judgments Calculation of Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest

2010

University of Texas CLE on Mastering the Art of Collecting Debts and Judgments Formation of the Judgment

2009

State Bar of Texas Advanced Appellate Seminar Federal and State Expert Testimony Under Daubert and Robinson: What’s the Difference?

2009

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers - The Dicta Challenging the Admissibility of Government Reports under Rules of Evidence and Daubert/Robinson

2008

Dallas Association of Young Lawyers - The Dicta A Whole New World of Texas Mandamus Practice

2007

Texas State Bar 17th Annual Conference on State and Federal Appeals Federal Discretionary Appeals

1997

Baylor Law Review Plugging the Gaping Hole: The Effect of 28 U.S.C. § 1367 on the Complete Diversity Requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution