No Photo

Kenneth Stuart Harter

Licensed for 46 years

Bankruptcy and debt Lawyer at Frisco, TX
Practice Areas: Bankruptcy & Debt, Business, Debt Collection ... +4 more

6160 Warren Pkwy Ste 100, Frisco, TX

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Kenneth

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 45 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1980

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 46 years

State: California

Acquired: 1979

Not Eligible to Practice Law (Not Entitled)

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Kenneth S. Harter

6160 Warren Pkwy Ste 100, Frisco, TX, 75034-9415

Law Offices of Kenneth S Harter

6160 Warren Pkwy Ste 100, Frisco, TX, 75034-9415

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kenneth Stuart Harter's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

5 star (0)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (3)

Posted by anonymous | June 24, 2019 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Not What I Had Hoped to Have Represent Me

I had high hopes for Ken Harter representing me as a small business owner. Initial meeting left me feeling positive and encouraged however after my $5k retainer I had very little if no contact with him, and had to initiate contact each and every time and was later handsomely billed for simple check-...in calls/e-mails. Ken sent me someone other client's case files one time erroneously and seems to lack administrative help for billing and accessibility. If you are looking for an attentive, responsive attorney I would not choose Ken. I was disappointed with his service and ended up using someone else. He did very very little to help me and still charged me handsomely. He was very unresponsive to text, e-mail and knew nothing about my case and was very unclear on where I stood. Again I would not recommend or hire him if were given another opportunity to do so. Nothing personal-Ken is a friendly warm individual in person and seems knowledgeable but lacks the attentiveness and detail oriented skills you need to aggressively fight for you.

Posted by Frances Damon Briggs | January 1, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

KNOW THE SERVICE YOU ARE PAYING FOR

Mr. Harter was my attorney. My ex was pro se. Mr. Harter had over 38 yrs of experience. After 27 yrs of marriage & my ex filing for divorce, I walked away with ZERO.. Mr Kenneth Harter took it upon himself to Grant my ex 100 percent of our business which my ex and I both worked in and which supported... our family. Mr Harter took it upon himself to Grant my ex all of the equipment from our business. I emailed my attorney (Mr Harter over 6 times regarding him granting my ex assets that we DID NOT AGREE ON. In one email, Mr Harter questioned; "what are you going to do with the tools, sale them? Use them? I doubt it" (MY ATTORNEY) Mr. Harter took it upon himself to grant my ex all finances having to do with a rental home which my ex and I owned. He granted my ex all past present and future finances, regarding my ex and my business. I had a judgement for a certain amount in the temp hearing procedure, Mr Harter did not include this in a qdro. In December of 2016, he informed me that he would put a lien on property that belong to my ex. He finally did this in March of 2017 (So he says) I was granted a certain amount of my ex's 401(k) Defined Contribution Plan, to purchase a home for my son and I. Mr Harter submitted a WORD FOR WORD Plan sample qdro, as my actual order. When I questioned MY ATTORNEY, Mr Harter about him submitting a plan sample, MY ATTORNEY EMAILED me and stated that it is REQUIRED that he use the sample. I requested this same sample; It stated, "It is NOT required to use this sample" Mr Harter waited about 2 weeks for my ex to contact him regarding changes that he (ex) didn't agree with in the decree of divorce. During this entire time, I (HAVE EMAILS) literally begged him (Mr Harter) to help me (His Client) My ex had filed an appeal regarding the judgement, although he'd agreed. During that time, Mr Harter allowed my ex to ban me from property that my ex and I both own and where I stored a lot of my belongings. My ex emailed My Attorney, informing him that he wanted my belongings off of the property. Although Mr Harter knew that my ex had appealed, (Mr Harter knew that I didn't have a home) he did nothing to stop my ex from banning my belongings. Mr Harter Knew the desperate state which my son and I were in. Yet he treated the issues as if my ex was his client. Mr Harter Never sent me a copy of the divorce decree with judges' Signature. He never sent me the Document for my name change. My ex filed a document for stay of retirement. (For my portion of the retirement that I was awarded & even though my ex and I had agreed on this) My Attorney didn't tell me. When I checked my case online and asked my attorney to email me the document. He did not. I had to pay for a copy of the document via public information. Even when I questioned Mr Harter of what the document was regarding, he would not tell me. I have document to prove EVERYTHING and more, that I am sharing. When I informed Mr Harter that the qdro could be amended he resigned. My son and I are STILL HOMELESS. I am still living from my vehicle, from place to place. The sample qdro submitted by Mr Harter assigned that I not obtain my share until my ex is 60. Although federal law's ERISA and the code have provided laws permitting the spouse early payment of benefit FOR THE PROVISION OF MARITAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. Also federal law provides that an order qualifies even if it requires early payment of BENEFITS. I am not writing this to be spiteful. I just believe that people should know the integrity and the type of service that they are paying for. It's scary, hurtful and devestating going through a divorce, but to have an attorney who does not have your best interest in mind, makes it worse. Although the qdro sample cautioned and permitted revisions, amending, modifying, options and choices to meet the client's intents, My Harter used the sample regardless, changing nothing. In the end, I received nothing, not a penny.

Posted by anonymous | March 8, 2016 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Worst lawyer money can buy!

When I first met Ken, he told me everything I wanted to hear and insisted I had nothing to worry about with my case. I paid him a retainer and made the poor mistake of trusting him. After several attempts to gain paperwork I needed for the temporary orders hearing, he finally sent it to me at 4:00p ...the day prior. When we went into court the next morning, it was even more clear that he had not even reviewed my case. After that hearing, I quickly found a new attorney and requested a refund on my retainer. My file, months later, still was never received nor have I ever received a refund and he will not return any calls or emails. He is an awful attorney and will not work hard on your behalf. Do yourself a favor and find someone who cares about your case!

See All Client Reviews

Kenneth Stuart Harter's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kenneth

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

1979

University of San Diego School of Law

Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.)

N/A

Univ of California Berkeley

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution