Chesterfield, MI
Employment and labor Lawyer at Chesterfield, MI
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Discrimination
OUTCOME: Panel ruled against the union, saving the Employer over $50,000,000.00
Union claimed, under Act 312 of the Public Acts of 1969, that its members were entitled to significantly greater pension and retiree medical benefits.
OUTCOME: The Arbitrator ruled that the Employer did not violate the collective bargaining agreement and therefore he denied the grievance.
Employer ignored seniority and promoted a newly hired employee over 5 highly senior bargaining unit members who bid for the position. The union took the position that seniority could not be ignored for ... promotions.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
