Megan Lee Wells

Megan Lee Wells

also known as Megan Wells

1.0
Rating: 6.4

Licensed for 10 years

Family Lawyer at North Little Rock, AR
Practice Areas: Family, General Practice, Lawsuits & Disputes, Criminal Defense

Po Box 5551, North Little Rock, AR

About Megan

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arkansas for 10 years

State: Arkansas

Acquired: 2016

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Megan Lee Wells

Po Box 5551, North Little Rock, AR, 72119-5551

Hilburn & Harper, Ltd.

One Riverfront Place, Eighth Floor, North Little Rock, AR, 72114

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Megan Lee Wells's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 2
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Posted by anonymous | April 25, 2026 | Hired Attorney | Family

Review Update

Review of Attorney Megan Wells My experience with Ms. Wells was extremely disappointing and revealed a pattern of serious professional failures. Although these events occurred in 2018, it has taken me years to process and articulate what happened because the representation itself was retraumatizin...g and significantly impacted my ability to focus, organize, or advocate for myself at the time. I hired Ms. Wells for a family law matter that did not require litigation — the opposing party could have resolved the issue with a simple conversation. Instead, he used the court system as a tool for control and harassment. Ms. Wells was fully aware of this dynamic, yet she failed to provide even the most basic level of advocacy or protection. From the beginning, the filings were built on a completely fabricated narrative framework. Every question was structured as a condemning accusation based on events that never occurred and had no connection to factual reality. I explained that the material was triggering and impossible to answer accurately without legal guidance, especially given the trauma‑related cognitive impairment I was experiencing. Despite promising to review the documents with me, she instructed me to complete them alone and never followed through. During both the deposition and my testimony, the opposing attorney repeatedly brought up a deeply traumatic event from 2016 involving the loss of my dog — an event that had nothing to do with the case and that I had long since made peace with. This was introduced solely to destabilize me emotionally. Ms. Wells allowed this line of questioning without objection, without preparation, and without any trauma‑informed support, despite knowing the history and the impact it had on me. The deposition phase exposed even more deficiencies. I was not prepared, not briefed, and not given any strategic direction. The extensive evidence I provided — which directly contradicted the false narrative — was never incorporated into her questioning. Her questioning of the opposing party avoided the issues that needed to be challenged. In court, she offered no meaningful rebuttal, no contextual clarification, and no challenge to the assumptions embedded in the filings. She simply allowed the opposing narrative to stand unchallenged. One of the most troubling moments occurred when Ms. Wells herself asked my child biased, leading questions that reinforced the false narrative rather than challenging it. Instead of protecting my child from being pulled into a distorted framework, she actively participated in it. Throughout the entire process, Ms. Wells failed to: challenge a demonstrably false narrative prepare her client for deposition or court use the evidence provided object to inappropriate or destabilizing questioning provide trauma‑informed support advocate at any critical juncture recognize or act on the misuse of the legal system Based on my experience, I cannot recommend Ms. Wells for any family law matter, especially those involving trauma, complex histories, or situations where an attorney must be willing to challenge false narratives and protect their client from further harm.

Posted by Danielle | May 14, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Litigation

Worst Lawyer Ever

This woman is childish and narcissistic. She forwarded my emails to opposing attorney. She admitted she was overwhelmed. When I would come to the office, I was told not to speak. She allowed unfounded accusations to be admitted as evidence. I even asked her if she liked the opposing attorney. My daug...hter told me she thought Megan worked for the other side! Seriously! This is no joke. This woman is awful!

See All Client Reviews

Megan Lee Wells's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Megan

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.4 (Good)

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Associate, Hilburn & Harper, Ltd.

Education

2015

University of Arkansas at Little Rock, William H. Bowen School of Law

JD

2010

Texas A&M University

BA

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution