Adrienne Alise Spiller

Adrienne Alise Spiller

also known as Adrienne Alise Tregnago

1.0
Rating: 6.7

Licensed for 9 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Moberly, MO
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Custody, Criminal Defense ... +2 more

110 North Fifth Street, Moberly, MO

About Adrienne

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Missouri for 9 years

State: Missouri

Acquired: 2016

Good Standing, Active

No misconduct found

Location

Gump, Faiella, & Bugalski LLC

110 North Fifth Street, Moberly, MO, 65270

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Adrienne Alise Spiller's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by anonymous | December 23, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody

Poor representation at a high cost

In spring 2025, I filed a contempt motion pro se after my ex-husband failed to pay what was owed. I had already appeared before the judge, who was willing to hear evidence of contempt. Opposing counsel initially indicated his client would pay, but then stopped communicating with me entirely. At that ...point, I retained Ms. Spiller again to help present the contempt case. While she ultimately helped me reach a settlement, I was significantly disappointed with the representation. Cost vs. Outcome: I spent $6,000 in legal fees to collect $2,145. This was a cut-and-dry contempt case - my ex was clearly in contempt, I had already filed the motion and done the foundational work myself, and opposing counsel had already agreed payment was owed. The judge was willing to hear the evidence, but it was never presented. Instead, I was pushed to settle immediately. Billing Practices: I was charged for every email I sent providing evidence - the very information needed to build the case. I had no idea I would be billed 20-30 minutes of attorney time simply for her to read emails containing evidence. I was essentially charged for providing the documentation needed to represent me, and then that evidence was never used. The final bill used my entire retainer plus an additional balance. Attorney Fees: I raised the possibility of requesting attorney fees multiple times and was told it was unlikely. I have since learned from a Boone County attorney that this judge does award fees in contempt cases. This advice cost me thousands of dollars and left me significantly worse off financially than if I’d continued representing myself. Errors: I had to identify and correct errors in legal documents myself, including the holiday schedule designation that opposing counsel then weaponized to claim I was violating the custody order. These oversights created additional conflict and should have been caught. Approach to Representation: I never felt like my attorney fought for me. Every time I provided evidence or pushed to present the contempt case, I was directed toward settling quickly rather than pursuing what I was legally entitled to. The approach seemed more focused on maintaining a cordial relationship with opposing counsel than on zealously representing my interests. At one point during our work together, I had to explicitly tell my attorney “I need you to be on my side.” High-Conflict/DV Cases: I did not feel the representation adequately addressed the dynamics of a high-conflict domestic violence situation. When I raised concerns about manipulation tactics and financial abuse being used through the legal system, I was encouraged to settle rather than strategically counter them or present this evidence to the judge. Communication: Communication was challenging throughout both periods of representation. Responses were often delayed or unclear, and I frequently felt I was driving the case forward myself rather than receiving proactive guidance. Jurisdiction: Ms. Spiller practices primarily in Hannibal, not Boone County where my case was heard. The lack of local court familiarity was a significant disadvantage, particularly regarding what this specific judge typically awards in contempt cases. Recommendation: If you have a high-conflict domestic violence case in Boone County, especially a clear-cut contempt matter, I strongly recommend hiring an attorney who specializes in DV cases and practices exclusively in that jurisdiction. You need someone who will actually fight for you and present your evidence to the judge, not someone who will push you to settle for far less than you’re entitled to while charging you thousands of dollars for the privilege. I have retained new counsel who speciali

See All Client Reviews

Adrienne Alise Spiller's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Adrienne

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.7 (Good)

Work Experience

2020 - Present

Associate Attorney, Columbia Family Law Group, LLC

2020 - Present

Member, Gump, Faiella, & Bugalski LLC

2016 - 2017

Assistant Prosecutor, Randolph County Prosecutor's Office

Education

2016

University of Missouri - Columbia School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2009

Missouri Southern State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution