Springfield, VA
Constitutional Lawyer at Springfield, VA
Practice Areas: Constitutional, Employment & Labor
OUTCOME: Won in significant part
U.S. Supreme Court held that under the Railway Labor Act objecting nonmembers cannot be required as a condition of employment to subsidize union organizing, member-only benefits, and the portions of un ... ion publications dealing with lawfully nonchargeable activities such as politics and lobbying.
OUTCOME: Won
U.S. Supreme Court held that objecting nonmembers challenging the union agency fee they must pay as a condition of employment cannot be requred to utilize a union-established arbitration procedure befo ... re bringing suit in federal court.
OUTCOME: Won in significant part
U.S. Supreme Court held that objecting nonmember public employees may not constitutionally be required as a condition of employment to subsidize union lobbying, except for ratification or implementatio ... n of their bargaining unit contract, union public relations activities, and illegal strikes.
OUTCOME: Won in significant part
U.S. Supreme Court held that objecting nonmembers cannot constitutionally be required to subsidize union political and ideological activity as a condition of employment.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
