Kent W. Minton

Kent W. Minton

1.0
Rating: 6.9

Licensed for 43 years

Litigation Lawyer at Independence, MO
Practice Areas: Litigation, Trusts, Estate Planning ... +2 more

Independence, MO

About Kent

Biography

Phi Delta Phi. Author: "Contested Claims," Chapter 19, Missouri Estate Administration, Fourth Edition.

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Missouri for 43 years

State: Missouri

Acquired: 1982

Good Standing, Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Kent W. Minton

Independence, MO, 64050

Stewart, Cook, Constance & Minton, L.L.C.

501 West Lexington, Independence, MO, 64050

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kent W. Minton's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by anonymous | September 07, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Landlord & Tenant

Terrible prep, not quick on his feet, slow to respond

Hired Kent's Law Firm (Stewart, Cook, Constance & Minton, L.L.C.) to represent us in a landlord dispute. Brad Constance was the lawyer we selected and talked with briefly (We have worked with Brad on a number of landlord issues over the years). As papers were served we called Brad Constance back t...o update on money owed by renter for the eviction process. Left voicemail with Brad's assistant (Kathy) that we had a death in the family the day before and I really needed her to call us back before noon that day. Needed to ask if we are to be present and provide a dollar amount owed (In the past this had been the practice). They did not call us back we had to call two more times that day before we were informed that the assistant left at noon even though we called and left voicemail at 9:00 A.M. and Brad was now out the rest of the week. We explained the reason for the call with a receptionist and she would look into it and someone would get back to us. Later that day the receptionist called back saying that Kent would handle this we did not need to be present and would call if he had any questions. He never contacted us prior to the hearing In this case we called the firm a total of five times before we had one returned phone call. Day of hearing the defendant made a false claim. Had Kent prepared he would have been able to defend claim and answer at the time. His inability to think on his feet, lack of preparation and slow to respond caused further delay and cost in removing the tenant. When Kent made his introduction to me after court over the phone and shared with me what he did not handle. Advising me to give my renter additional two free weeks (Renters Request) of lodging and asking questions that clearly had he returned our calls in the first place he had been prepared and would not have resulted in lost time, property damage and money. Court gave my renter another week as my attorney was clearly not prepared. In my conversation with Kent, I informed him that he got out smarted by an idiot. He quickly ended the call and the next day during my fathers funeral Brad Constance calls and leaves a voice mail. Upon returning his call we are informed that the law firm will no longer represent us in this or any matter moving forward With less then a week to go to the second hearing our Lawyer walks away leaving us to represent ourselves. The day of court rolls around and Brad Constance withdraws in open court and leaves. At the end of the day we won with our hearing renter was told to leave however the time delay for our lawyer not returning calls or asking questions and unable to defend the silly claim of the renter, cost us a additional months rent. As it was explained to Brad in the beginning we wanted them out prior to the end of the month to allow time for repair and clean-up. This was clearly not communicated to Kent as he allowed the delays to take place. My regret is that I could not have fired Kent Minton and Brad Constance for this behavior I feel was very un-ethical.

See All Client Reviews

Kent W. Minton's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kent

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.9 (Good)

Honors

N/A

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Member, Stewart, Cook, Constance & Minton, L.L.C.

Education

1982

University of Missouri-Kansas City

J.D.

1976

Central Missouri State University

B.S.

N/A

University of Tulsa

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution