Washington, DC
Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Discrimination ... +2 more
OUTCOME: 733 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D.D.C. 2010) (partial denial of summary judgment)
Partial denial of employer's summary judgment motion; court ruled that factual issues relating to lateral transfer and subsequent termination, along with falsification of disciplinary notices, preclude ... d summary judgment.
OUTCOME: 137 Daily Washington Law Reporter 2673 (2009) (court ruled in client's favor)
In employment discrimination dispute, court agreed with our client that the employer's confidentiality agreement violated public policy if it precluded employees from cooperating with government invest ... igations, so that the employer could not obtain a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order against our client.
OUTCOME: 2009 WL 3048675 (D. Md. 2009) (granted motion to remand)
The district court granted our client's motion to remand case to state court; court agreed that mention of pension issue in amended complaint did not warrant removal to federal court.
OUTCOME: 136 Daily Washington Law Reporter 1205 (2008)
Court agreed with our client, in an employment and defamation dispute, that the employer failed to satisfy the rigorous criteria for obtaining an overbroad protective order that would preclude any diss ... emination of discovery materials.
OUTCOME: 518 F. Supp. 2d 50 (D.D.C. 2007) (court ruling in client's favor)
Defamation case against publisher / executive of non-profit organization; we obtained dismissal of claims against our client.
OUTCOME: 2007 WL 141949 (N.D. Ind. 2007) (denied motion to dismiss)
Denied employer's motion to dismiss; finding that plaintiff properly stated Sarbanes-Oxley and common law wrongful termination claims, and Indiana claims for blacklisting and tortious interference with ... contract
OUTCOME: 362 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D.D.C. 2005) (denied summary judgment motion)
After extensive discovery, court denied defendants' motion for summary judgment, and agreed with our client that numerous factual issues relating to her termination precluded summary judgment. Court a ... lso found that defendants had waived any qualified immunity defense.
OUTCOME: 221 F.R.D. 661 (D. Kan. 2004) (ruling on motion to compel)
Court granted our client's motion to compel in large part; found waiver of qualified immunity defense and waiver of attorney-client privilege.
OUTCOME: 202 F.R.D. 31 (D.D.C. 2001) (ruling on motion to compel)
Court granted our client's motion to compel in part, in an employment discrimination case.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
