Jordan Bernard Cherrick

Jordan Bernard Cherrick

5.0
Rating: 8.8

Licensed for 44 years

Appeals Lawyer at Saint Louis, MO
Practice Areas: Appeals, Constitutional, Defective and Dangerous Products, Litigation

47 Briarcliff, Saint Louis, MO

About Jordan

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 43 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1982

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Licensed in Missouri for 44 years

State: Missouri

Acquired: 1981

Good Standing, Active

No misconduct found

Location

Jordan Cherrick

47 Briarcliff, Saint Louis, MO, 63124

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jordan Bernard Cherrick's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Jerry H | July 01, 2014 | Appeals

A trusted lawyer

Jordan was instrumental in our appeal directly to the Missouri Supreme, bypassing the intermediate appellate court, and resulted in our making new law in MO on alcohol, prevailing on the appeal, and a new trial. After the second trial and a 30% reduction in the verdict, Jordan was once again a key ...member of our appellate team that saw us before the MO Supreme Court and prevailing once again. He has my complete trust and confidence.

See All Client Reviews

Jordan Bernard Cherrick's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jordan

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.8 (Excellent)

Honors

2021

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Twenty Five Years of Service, American Law Institute

2013

Top Attorney, KC Magazine

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2005

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

1991

David J. Dixon Appellate Advocacy Award, Missouri Bar Foundation

1991

David J. Dixon Appellate Advocacy Award, Missouri Bar Foundation

N/A

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

Associations

1993 - Present

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Member

1984 - Present

Supreme Court of the United States

Member

1981 - Present

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Member

American Law Institute

Member

American Bar Foundation

Fellow

Sample of Legal Cases

Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina Ports Authority, 535 U.S. 743 (2002)

Coggins v. Laclede Gas Co., 37 S.W.3d 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Planned Parenthood of Mid-Missouri and Eastern Kansas, Inc. v. Dempsey, 167 F.3d 458 (8th Cir. 1999)

Redfield v. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc.,

State v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 37 S.W.3d 222 (Mo. 2001) (en banc)

Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., 243 F.3d 486 (8th Cir. 2001)

State v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas, 66 S.W.3d 16 (Mo. 2002) (en banc)

State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Messina, 71 S.W. 3d 602 (Mo. 2002) (en banc)

Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Inverizon Intern., Inc., 295 F.3d 870 (8th Cir. 2002)

Caballo Coal Co., v. Indiana Michigan Power Co., 305 F.3d 795 (8th Cir. 2003)

Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina Ports Authority, 535 U.S. 743 (2002)

State v. Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of St. Louis Region, Inc., 97 S.W. 3d 54 (E.D. Mo. 2002)

Heartland Bank v. Heartland Home Finance, Inc., 335 F.3d 810 (8th Cir. 2003)

GMAC Commercial Credit LLC v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827 (8th Cir. 2004)

Aaron v. Target Corp., 357 F.3d 768 (8th Cir. 2004)

CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co. Ltd., 589 U.S. ___

Christian County, Missouri v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. , 200 S.W.3d 524 (Mo. 2006) (en banc)

Smith v. Nissan, 462 F.3d 920 (8th Cir. 2006)

Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606 (1985)

City of Ladue v. Gilleo, 512 U.S. 43 (1994)

See More Legal Cases

Education

1981

Boston University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1978

Yeshiva University

BA - Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude

Speaking Engagements

1997

Unknown Name

Winning on Appeal

1996

Washington University School of Law, St. Louis, Missouri

Guest speaker at seminar on Supreme Court Advocacy

1995

Unknown Name

Mastering the Appeal

1995

Washington University School of Law, St. Louis, Missouri

Guest speaker at seminar on Supreme Court Advocacy

1994

Saint Louis University School of Law

Speaker on “Oral Argument before the Supreme Court of the United States: City of Ladue v. Gilleo,”

1994

Saint Louis University School of Law

Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court of the United States: City of Ladue v. Gilleo

1993

Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis

Speaker on Appellate Advocacy

1992

University of Missouri, Columbia

Speaker on Appellate Advocacy, Seminar on the Federal Courts

1992

Saint Louis University School of Law

Guest speaker at seminar on Appellate Advocacy

1989

St. Louis University

Chairman and Speaker, Mastering the Appeal

Publications

2020

LinkedIn Constitutional Adjudication in Israel? The High Court Speaks Out for Prisoners’ Rights,

2018

LinkedIn Memories of a Legal Giant: John C. Shepherd, Esquire

2018

LinkedIn Lawyers Are Not Fungible

2017

LinkedIn “Jew” on the Supreme Court of the United States

2016

LinkedIn Creative Defense Strategies Needed in the Trial and Appellate Court

1997

44 Federal Lawyer. 26 Judges Profile

1995

XIV Saint Louis University Public Law Review 339 Do Communities Have the Right to Protect Homeowners From Sign Pollution?: The Supreme Court Says No in City of Ladue v. Gilleo,

1995

St. Louis Lawyer Should Trial Lawyers Litigate Their Own Appeals?

1993

ABA Manual Appellate Practice Manual

1993

The Docket Advocacy and Emotion, 138 F.R.D. 619 (reprinted)

1991

138 F.R.D. 619 Advocacy and Emotion

1990

Appellate Practice Manual Issues, Facts, and Appellate Strategy

1989

St. Louis Lawyer The Art of Oral Advocacy in Appellate Courts

1989

St. Louis Lawyer Successful Appellate Advocacy — All In One Word

1981

30 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 835 Constitutional Adjudication in Israel? The High Court Speaks Out for Prisoners' Rights

1980

65 Massachusetts Law Review 175 The Homestead Act: An Important Law to Protect the Family But a Law in Need of Reform
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution