Reading, PA
Energy and utilities Lawyer at Reading, PA
Practice Areas: Energy & Utilities, Oil & Gas ... +18 more
OUTCOME: In favor of client
September 18, 2014 FERC Order denying PPL rehearing and dismissing request for clarification by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission regarding Order denying application to terminate mandatory pur ... chase obligation re PPL Electric Utilities Corporation under QM13-2. 145 FERC 61,053
OUTCOME: In favor of client
Order denying application to terminate mandatory purchase obligation re PPL Electric Utilities Corporation under QM13-2. Commissioners Clark and Moeller concurring in a joint statement. 145 FERC 61,053 ...
OUTCOME: In favor of our client
That the Application of Pike County Taxi, Inc. at Docket No. A-2008-2062390 be and hereby is approved, granting the right to begin to transport, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, persons, upon cal ... l or demand, in the Counties of Pike and Wayne, Pennsylvania.
OUTCOME: In favor of our client, AES Armenia Mountain Wind LLC
Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court and court below. Commission did not err in considering application to construct a wind farm because applicant had necessary proprietar ... y interest in the subject property. Further, waiver from the local ordinance's screening requirements for the wind turbines was proper because local ordinance permitted waivers, which was allowed by 53 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 10503(8).
OUTCOME: In favor of our client, AES Armenia Mountain Wind LLC
Commission did not err in considering application to construct a wind farm because applicant had necessary proprietary interest in the subject property. Further, waiver from the local ordinance's scree ... ning requirements for the wind turbines was proper because local ordinance permitted waivers, which was allowed by 53 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 10503(8).
OUTCOME: In favor of our client, Penelec
Because utilities purchased power from outside sources, the utilities capacity needs and costs were to be determined when the qualifying facilities filed a petition asking the public utilities commissi ... on to compel the utility to purchase capacity.
OUTCOME: Affirmed the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
Appeal from Order of Commonwealth Court entered January 9, 1995, at No. 3104 C.D. 1993 and No. 904 C.D. 1994, Affirming in Part and Reversing in Part Order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ent ... ered December 13, 1993, at No. 1-900005 and Remanding Case and Vacating Order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission entered April 8, 1994, at No. 1-900005.
OUTCOME: The court reversed the order of respondent, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (commission), which granted a waiver of eligibility requirements for petitioner utility's most advantageous rates to respondent utility customer, and remanded the case.
Public utility commission did not have authority to grant utility customer waiver of eligibility requirements of more advantageous tariff rate in absence of any finding that relevant tariff rate was un ... just, unreasonable, or discriminatory.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
