Rockford, IL
Criminal defense Lawyer at Rockford, IL
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Juvenile ... +2 more
OUTCOME: The case was dismissed. This driver did not face any jail time or fines as a result of this arrest.
RS’ driving privileges had been suspended as a result of a DUI and he was arrested for driving on a suspended driver’s license. After an investigation, Brendan determined that the only reason RS’s driv ... ing privileges remained suspended was due to an unpaid reinstatement fee to the Secretary of State.
OUTCOME: The case was dismissed and MM returned to her mother’s care. MM and her mother did not have to spend any additional time apart from one another.
MM was taken from her mother’s custody as a result of DCFS’s failure to perform basic investigation into the child’s medical history. The State filed a neglect petition seeking to make the child a ward ... of the court. Following a cursory investigation, Brendan provided relevant information to the State to demonstrate that MM had received appropriate medical care.
OUTCOME: As a result of effective, proactive representation, the suspect was never charged with a crime.
A Winnebago County criminal investigation began and the suspect was notified. The possible penalty range for the suspect would have been up to 30 years in prison on each count if charged. After submitt ... ing to a polygraph investigation and providing additional evidence to the investigators, it became clear that the State would not likely be able to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
OUTCOME: 2 days in custody
KB was charged with taking money that did not belong to her. Taking responsibility for her actions, KB faced a statutory maximum of 30 years in prison. Following a sentencing hearing, KB was sentenced ... to two (2) days in custody.
OUTCOME: As a result, MW was found NOT GUILTY of DUI, suffered no revocation of her driving privileges, her driving privileges remained valid and she was not ordered to take alcohol classes
MW was arrested with her young child in the car and charged with DUI. Following a trial, the State’s evidence could not show that at the time MW was impaired.
OUTCOME: The case was dismissed and SB returned to her parents’ care. SB and her parents did not have to spend any additional time apart from one another.
SB was taken from his father’s custody as a result of DCFS’s failure to perform basic investigation into the child’s whereabouts. A babysitter had taken the child to the police station and dropped the ... child off deciding that she was finished for the day despite the parents’ having arranged for her to care for the child until they were off work. The police contacted DCFS who took the child into protective custody after DCFS claimed to have attempted to contact the parents. The State filed a neglect petition seeking to make the child a ward of the court.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
