Christian v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010-Ohio-3040

Jun 29, 2010

OUTCOME: Expert testimony admissible for summary judgment purposes

Smith v. Speakman, 2008-Ohio-6610

Dec 16, 2008

OUTCOME: Summary judgment in favor of insurer reversed

insured did not receive notice of addition of policy coverage exclusion

Smith v. ProMedica Health System, Inc., 2007-Ohio-4189

Aug 17, 2007

OUTCOME: Summary judgment in favor of defendant reversed

A medical expert with some degree of knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education in the field he seeks to render an expert opinion is a sufficiently qualified.

Bentley v. Pendleton, 2004-Ohio-3848; 105 Ohio St.3d 326, 2005-Ohio-1824; 2005-Ohio-3495

Mar 30, 2005

OUTCOME: summary judgment in favor of insurer reversed

Ohio Uninsured Motorist Statute applies to “fronting” policies

Boerger v. Davis., 2004-Ohio-3882

Jul 22, 2004

OUTCOME: summary judgment affirmed

Federal court system maintains exclusive jurisdiction over an action by a self-insured ERISA health plan to recover money.