Darcy Lynn Ibach

Darcy Lynn Ibach

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 6.9

Licensed for 39 years

Insurance Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Insurance, Appeals, Mediation

550 West Adams St. Suite 300, Chicago, IL

About Darcy

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 39 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1986

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Darcy Lynn Ibach

550 West Adams St. Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60661-3665

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Darcy Lynn Ibach's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Darcy Lynn Ibach's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Darcy

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.9 (Good)

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Partner, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith

Associations

Chicago Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. North River Ins. Co., et. al., Docket No.: CAM-L-4901-08 (N.J. Law Div. Mar. 4, 2010)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

•PVSC, et. al. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., et al., 2010 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 475 (App. Div. Mar. 8, 2010)

Affirmed Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• Michles & Booth, P.A., et. al. v. Admiral Insurance Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 16987 (N.D. FL)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

•General Security Nat’l Ins. Co. v. North River Ins. Co., Docket Nos. MRS-L-2792-07, MRS-L-2868-07 (N.J. Law Div. Mar. 31, 2009)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

Farmers Elevator, Inc. V. Hartford Ins. Co. et.al., 2009 Neb. App. Lexis 189 (Nov. 2009)

Affirmed Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• North River Ins. Co. v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26576 (S.D. FL)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• TIG Ins. Co. v. Chapman & Chapman, P.C., 436 F. Supp. 2d 1047, 1058 (D.N.D. 2006)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• Nelson, et al. v. Coregis Ins. Co., 2006 Ga. App. Lexis 1428 (Ga. App. 2006)

Affirmed Judgment for Client Insurer

• Columbia Casualty Co. v. Coregis Ins. Co., 123 Dauph. 1 (Pa. 2006)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• Coregis Ins. Co. v. City of Harrisburg, County of Dauphin, 2006 WL 860710 (M.D. Pa.)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• Harris v. Coregis Ins. Co., et al., 2005 WL 1362337 (S.D.MS)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• TIG Ins. Co. v. Lohman & Lohman, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30921 (D. Ct., Co. 2004)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• Greenburgh Eleven School District v. National Union, et al., 758 N.Y.2d 291 (N.Y. 1st Dept. 2003), (cert. den. 2004)

Affirmed Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• Badger Scaffold, Inc. v. Hartford, 260 Wis. 2d 602 (2003)

Affirmed Judgment for Client Insurer

• TIG v. Reliable Research Co., 334 F.3d 630 (7th Cir. 2003)

Affirmed Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• McDonough v. Westport Ins. Corp. CA Superior Court (CA 2002)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

• International Ins. Co. v. Peabody Int’l Corp., 1991 WL 23630 (N.D. IL)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

International Ins. Co. v. Peabody Int’l Corp., 747 F. Supp. 477 (N.D. IL 1990)

Summary Judgment for Client Insurer

See More Legal Cases

Education

1986

DePaul University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution