No Photo

Julie Haran-Castaneda

Licensed for 33 years

Lawyer at Chicago, IL

1300 W Belmont Ave, Chicago, IL

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Julie

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 33 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1993

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Doah

1300 W Belmont Ave, Chicago, IL, 60657-3200

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Julie Haran-Castaneda's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.3 /5.0

12 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (12) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 12 reviews

Posted by Citizen | August 17, 2026

Ignored evidence, issued impertinent judgment

Like others in these reviews, I believe that Julie Haran-Castaneda did not review the evidence in my parking ticket appeal, and instead issued an inapplicable boilerplate response without actually reviewing my simple case. Although I ordered my new parking permit two weeks before the deadline, the... new permit did not arrive until the day After the deadline (I was ticketed the day before). I submitted proof of my timely paid order and highlighted the excessive time it took for the permit to arrive in the mail, but Judge Julie did not address my argument for the delayed receipt. Rather, she mischaracterized my position as arguing that the permit was present at the time of ticketing (I never alleged this), and because it was actually Not present, the ticket was valid. Shame on this judge. I imagine there are good judges in her position, but it does not surprise me to find bad ones like her relegated to low level revenue extortion.

Posted by anonymous | March 09, 2026

Parking Non-Payment Decision – Receipt Not Reviewed

The supporting evidence does not appear to have been considered. Decisions made without reviewing the full context can lead to incomplete conclusions, and I hope this becomes clearer with broader scrutiny. The judge denied the claim for non-payment of vehicle parking; however, the receipt confirmi...ng payment does not appear to have been reviewed.

Posted by anonymous | January 28, 2026

Terrible monster

Can’t wait till the day she dies. Never looks at evidence and doesn’t give any grace. Parking meter only expired by 2 minutes. She gave such a horrible attitude like she gets paid extra for every ticket she makes people pay. Absolutely terrible monster.

Posted by anonymous | April 29, 2024

Doesn’t review evidence

Biased. Did not review and evidence. Must be bought and paid for by the city.

Posted by Daniel | April 28, 2023

It Will Be a Great Day For Chicago When This Woman Expires

This old bat needs to get her eyes, brain, and soul checked. I will dance on her grave when she dies and will pray for it everyday until it happens.

See All Client Reviews

Julie Haran-Castaneda's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Julie

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution