James P. Muraff

James P. Muraff

also known as James Perry Muraff, Jim Muraff

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 31 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Trademark Application, Trademark Infringement ... +4 more

300 North LaSalle St., Suite 1400, Chicago, IL

About James

Biography

Practice Areas

7

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 31 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1994

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

McDonald Hopkins LLC

300 North LaSalle St., Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60654

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

James P. Muraff's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

James P. Muraff's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse James

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2024

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2023

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2022

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2021

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2020

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2019

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2018

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2016

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

Work Experience

2020 - Present

Partner, McDonald Hopkins LLC

2006 - 2020

Partner, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP

1994 - 2006

Partner, Wallenstein & Wagner, Ltd.

1990 - 1992

Software Engineer, Siemens Corporation

Associations

2009 - Present

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago, Litigation Committee

Contributing Author

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago

Former Board Member

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Admitted

Illinois Supreme Court

Admitted

United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit

Admitted

United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Admitted

United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Admitted

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Admitted

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut

Admitted

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Admitted

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Admitted

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago - Educational Foundation

Vice President

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago - Educational Foundation

Treasurer

Sample of Legal Cases

Cesca Therapeutics, Inc. v. Syngen Inc. (E.D. Cal.)

Represented plaintiff in a trade secret, patent infringement, and breach of contract matter relating to stem cell storage devices.

IP Innovation v. Merant PLC and IP Innovation v. Information Builders, Inc. (N.D. Ill.)

Represented plaintiff in a patent infringement matter relating to database access technology.

Optodyne v. Leica (N.D. Ill.)

Represented plaintiff in a trade secret misappropriation matter relating to optical positioning and control systems.

Knowles Electronics, Inc. v. Microtronic U.S., Inc. (N.D. Ill.)

Represented patent owner in a patent infringement matter relating to transducers and hearing aid technology.

Jackson v. Alaska Airlines Inc. et al.; Jackson v. NEC Corporation; Jackson v. Advanced Telecom (N.D. Ill.)

Represented patent owner in various patent infringement matters relating to automated interactive voice response (IVR) systems.

Interactive Health LLC v. Finger-Fitting Products Inc. (C.D. Cal.)

Represented defendant in a patent infringement matter relating to adult novelty products.

M&R Printing Equipment, Inc. v. Anatol Equipment Manufacturing Co., et al. (N.D. Ill.)

Represented patent owner in a patent infringement matter relating to a clothing printing apparatus.

Cooper Bauck Corp. v. Dolby Labs, Inc. (N.D. Ill.)

Represented defendant in a patent infringement matter relating to audio electronics technology.

Palmgard International, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Inc. (N.D. Ill.)

Represented patent owner in a patent infringement matter relating to sports equipment.

Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. United Scrap Metal, Inc. (N.D. Ill.)

Represented defendant in a patent infringement matter relating to digital video surveillance systems.

Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Presence Hospitals PRV (C.D. Ill.)

Represented defendant in a patent infringement matter relating to digital video surveillance systems.

CarLyd Enterprises v. Jean-Robert Paquette (S.D. Oh.)

Represented defendant in a patent infringement matter relating to sporting goods.

Kenneth S. Cohen v. Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. (E.D. Va.)

Represented plaintiff in breach of contract and unjust enrichment matter involving income tax planning software.

Johnsonville Sausage, LLC v. Klement Sausage Co., Inc. (E.D. Wi.)

Acted as a testifying expert in a design patent infringement matter regarding food product packaging.

Vevo LLC v. Fevo Inc. (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)

Represented defendant in a trademark opposition proceeding.

Redbox Automated Retail, LLC v. Box, Inc. (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)

Represented plaintiff in a trademark opposition proceeding.

Redbox Automated Retail, LLC v. Beijing Jiadun Building Materials Co., Ltd. (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)

Represented plaintiff in a trademark opposition proceeding.

CZS Holdings LLC (d/b/a Pur360) v. Arpad Kolbe and ARKO Ozone & UV Disinfection (N.D. Ill.)

Represented plaintiff in a breach of contract and trade secret misappropriation matter relating to disinfection and eradication systems and services.

SBS Consulting Group, Inc. v. Alpha Exploration Company (D. AZ.)

Represented plaintiff in a trademark infringement and unfair competition matter relating to social and business networking platforms.

Redbox Automated Retail, LLC v. Chinecherem Eze LLC (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)

Represented plaintiff in a trademark opposition proceeding.

Redbox Automated Retail, LLC v. The Giving Dogs (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)

Represented plaintiff in a trademark opposition proceeding.

Angel Citycam, LLC v. BBJ Enterprises, LLC (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)

Represented plaintiff in a trademark opposition proceeding involving restaurant services.

Fevo Inc. v. Spinzo Corp. (E.D. Mi.)

Represented plaintiff in trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition matter involving e-commerce collective purchasing technology and services.

Intora, Inc. (dba Sportsheets) v. The Partnerships and Unicorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (N.D. Ill.)

Represented plaintiff in trademark infringement, counterfeiting, and unfair competition matter involving adult novelty products.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1994

University of Illinois - Chicago School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

BS - Computer Engineering

Speaking Engagements

2023

A Look Back at 2023 and What Lies Ahead in 2024

IP Portfolio Strategies to Maximize Your Return on Investment

2022

Growth, Opportunities, and Challenges Heading into 2023

Innovation opportunities in economic downturns and how to protect them

2021

IPLAC 2021 Annual IP Symposium

Perspectives from the Judges and Inside Counsel

2020

The IPLAC 2020 Annual IP Symposium

An Afternoon with the Judges

2019

Patent Application Readiness

Patent Prosecution Strategy

2019

3rd Annual Intellectual Property Roundtable

Artificial Intelligence: Fault Lines, Key Issues, and the Way Ahead

Publications

2023

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2022

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2021

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2020

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2019

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2018

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2017

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2016

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2015

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2014

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2013

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2012

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2011

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2010

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2009

Thomson Reuters Patent Claim Construction in the Federal Circuit

2007

Unknown Licensee May Challenge Licensed Patent In Federal Court Without Breaching License Agreement

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution