Stacy Dolan Fulco

Stacy Dolan Fulco

4.0
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 28 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Accident, Wrongful Death ... +2 more

One North Franklin, 10 Floor, Chicago, IL

About Stacy

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 28 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1997

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Cremer, Spina, Shaughnessy, Jansen & Siegert, LLC

One North Franklin, 10 Floor, Chicago, IL, 60606

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Stacy Dolan Fulco's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 3
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Michael | December 23, 2014 | Litigation

General Review of Representation

Attorney Fulco has provided quality representation to the company while at the same time holding our litigation costs at a reasonable level. She always adheres to our case handling standards and billing requirements. She is responsive to our questions and inquiries, keeping us informed and up-to-dat...e. I respect her professionalism as a partner in handling litigation. She identifies the issues and moves to resolve them expeditiously. She tells you what you should be thinking so that you can move the matter to resolution without incurring unnecessary costs. She is not afraid to try a case and is well prepared to do so should the matter proceed to trial.

Posted by Michael | April 11, 2014 | Litigation

Michael M. Watt retired former Director of Loss Prevention, Dominick's Finer Foods, a Division of Safeway

It has been my professional privilege to have worked closely with Stacy involving complex defense litigation. The outcomes have been favorable with minimal payout from the corporation largely due to the expert and knowledgeable counsel of Stacy Dolan Fulco. Stacy is an asset to any business. It ...is a source of pride that this review is given.

Posted by anonymous | April 10, 2014 | Litigation

A FIVE STAR ATTORNEY

I have been working with Stacy Fulco for the past 10 years in civil litigation cases as a client. I have never worked with an attorney that was more driven and dedicated to the goals of her client. She is not only knowledgeable and trustworthy, but her hard working ethic to bring successful results... for the client has always been her primary task at hand. She has prevailed in numerous Motions For Summary Judgments before the Courts in Cook, Will and DuPage County. In the one case we decided to try - a defense verdict was granted. I think the most important element of her character as an attorney is the fact that when ever I contact her she always responds immediately resolving my issues at hand. The second element that I admire in Ms. Fulco is her aggressiveness to meet any challenge head on with innovative and new ideas , again to accomplish the task at hand for the client. She has truly provided Five Star Legal Service to this client.

See All Client Reviews

Stacy Dolan Fulco's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Stacy
Charles Thomas Jacques headshot
Charles Jacques

Personal injury lawyer | Oct 06

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Stacy is very professional and an outstanding trial lawyer."

Sean Cleary headshot
Sean Cleary

Personal injury lawyer | Oct 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. An extremely talented and well respected attorney in the legal community."

G. Grant Dixon III headshot
G. Grant Dixon

Litigation lawyer | Sep 12

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Stacy is a great lawyer who knows litigation. She is a tough opponent, zealous advocate and represents her clients well. I readily endorse Stacy."

Michael J. McDonough headshot
Michael McDonough

Litigation lawyer | Sep 11

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Michael J. McDonough headshot
Michael McDonough

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Honors

N/A

AV® Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2002 - Present

Partner, Cremer Spina, Shaughnessy, Jansen & Siegert, LLC

1997 - 2002

Associate, Weldon-Linne & Vogt

Associations

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel

Member

Defense Research Institute (Retail & Hospitality and Women in the Law Committees)

Member

National Association of Professional Women

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Delaney v. Dominick's Finer Foods, LLC, et al.

Summary judgment upheld on appeal

Cooper v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Summary Judgment For Defendnant

Sirota v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Defense Verdict

Gallo v. Dominick's Finer Foods, et al.

Settled At Trial

Martens v. Hussmann Corp.

Settlment And Lien Recovery

Pydo v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Summary Judgment For Defendant

Prescott v. Starbucks, et al.

Summary Judgment For Defendant

Reed v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Defense Trial Verdict

Stewart v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Summary Judgment For Defendant

Kawash v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Summary Judgment For Defendant

Bruzan v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Dismissal With Prejudice

Vuksanovic v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Summary Judgment For Defendant

Schleuter v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Case Dismissed With Prejudice

Mariy v. Dominick's Finer Foods

Case Dismissed

Hudok v. Starbucks, et al.

Defense Arbitration Ruling

Estate of Glynn v. Dominick's Finer Foods, et al.

Summary Judgment For Defendant

Salinas v. DePaul University, et al.

Defense Arbitration Ruling

Dahl v. J. Pease Construction Co., et al.

Case Dismissed With Prejudice

Jones v. Dr. Natesha, et al.

Summary Judgment For Defendants

Williams v. Elyea, et al.

Summary Judgment For Defendants

Greco v Natinoal Construction Services, et al.

Settlment And Lien Recovery

See More Legal Cases

Education

1997

DePaul University College of Law

JD/MBA - Juris Doctorate and MBA

1993

Illinois State University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2007

Safeway Casualty Claims Conference

Experts & Motions for Summary Judgment

2000

Yearly Conference

Babies Behind Bars

Publications

2014

In-House Defense Quarterly (DRI, Defense Research Institute) Don't Let Your Manual Be A Liability: The Danger of Security

2000

CorrectCare What is Deliberate Indifference?

2000

CorrectCare Medical Negligence and Deliberate Indifference — What is the Difference?

N/A

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel - Quarterly Recent Decisions Article - Quarterly

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution