Donald J Mizerk

Donald J Mizerk

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.5

Licensed for 37 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Litigation

120 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 2200, Chicago, IL

About Donald

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property 75%

30 years | 50 cases

75%
Litigation 25%

38 years | 75 cases

25%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 25 years

State: California

Acquired: 2000

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois for 37 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1988

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Husch Blackwell LLP

120 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 2200, Chicago, IL, 60606

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Donald J Mizerk's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Donald J Mizerk's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Donald

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.5 (Superb)

Honors

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Leading Lawyer, Leading Lawyers Network

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Leading Lawyer, Leading Lawyers Network

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Leading Lawyer, Leading Lawyers Network

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Office Managing Partner, Husch Blackwell LLP

2009 - 2014

Partner, Husch Blackwell LLP

1997 - 2009

Partner, Winston & Strawn, LLP

1991 - 1996

Chief Exec. Assistant State's Attorney, Cook County State Attorney's Office

1989 - 1991

Associate, Winston & Strawn, LLP

1988 - 1989

Law Clerk to Hon. Harry W. Wellford, United States Court Of Appeals, 6th Circuit

Associations

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Par Pharm., et al. v. TWi Pharm., 2014 WL 694976 (D. MD)

Judgment in favor of TWi following trial; '576 patent determined to be invalid

In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsule Patent Litigation, 2012 W.L. 95592 (D. Del. 2012)

Judgment of noninfringement entered for Anchen and attorneys fees awarded

TechnoLines, LP v. GST AutoLeather, Inc., 799 F.Supp.2d 871 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

Case dismissed.

Lewitton v. ITA Software, Inc., 585 F.3d 377 (7th Cir. 2009)

Court ordered ITA Software to honor full amount of stock options requested. (Company later acquired by Google)

Personified, LLC v. Sales Consultants of Cary LLC, 2008 WL 3200842 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

Case dismissed.

Biovail v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 519 F.Supp.2d 39 (D.D.C. 2007)

Injunction request denied.

Herbst v. O'Malley, 90 F.3d 1300 (7th Cir. 1996)

Court affirmed district court refusal to assess fees against Cook County

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

Vanderbilt Univ SOL

law

N/A

Illinois Wesleyan Univ

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2014

Paragraph IV Disputes: Expert Insights on Hatch-Waxman Litigation Strategies Let the Games Begin: Advanced Strategies for Drafting

2014

ACI Paragraph IV Disputes Master Symposium Experts, Problems of Proof, Dispositive Motions

2011

2010

Paragraph IV Disputes

A Closer Look at Generic v. Generic Lawsuits

Publications

2013

Chicago Lawyer Magazine More Law, Less Firm

2003

Illinois Civil Practice Motions at the Close of All the Evidence

1987

Vanderbilt Law Review The Coercion Test and Conditional Federal Grants to the States

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution