Michael Patrick Padden

Michael Patrick Padden

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 43 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Litigation, Trademark Infringement ... +2 more

2 N La Salle St Ste 1200, Chicago, IL

About Michael

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 43 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1982

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Pearne & Gordon LLP

2 N La Salle St Ste 1200, Chicago, IL, 60602-3702

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael Patrick Padden's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 3
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Business

Posted by anonymous | May 17, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Business

Mike Padden

Mike handled a number of litigation matters for me when I was general counsel of a telecom equipment manufacturer. Many of them involved intellectual property matters, but he also handled general business and employment litigation. He is very bright, very thorough, and at the same time is cost-cons...cious.

Posted by anonymous | May 17, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Business

Successful Aribitration of a difficult case

Mike was extremely effective in the case that arose out of a termination of Tessco as a distributor and was resolved after he removed the case from Maryland state court and got a favorable result at a preliminary injunction hearing in arbitration. Very difficult plaintiff

See All Client Reviews

Michael Patrick Padden's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael
Richard William Young headshot
Richard Young

Litigation lawyer | Jun 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I have known and worked with Mike Padden for more than 20 years, primarily in IP litigation matters. Mike is an exceptional litigator and business counselor. He is creative and dogged in his approach to litigation. He is also extraordinarily professional and civil in all of his dealings. When I need to refer a client to another IP litigator, Mike is always at the top of my list. He's smart and strategic and he knows how to win."

Michael Robert Osterhoff headshot
Michael Osterhoff

Intellectual property lawyer | Jun 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Leading Lawyer, Law Bulletin Publishing Company

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Partner, Litigation Group Leader, Pearne & Gordon, LLP

2011 - 2013

Partner, Levenveld Pearlstein, LLC

2001 - 2011

Partner, Howrey

1982 - 2001

Associate and Partner, Gardner Carton & Douglas

1981 - 1982

Law Clerk, U.S. District Court, ND Ind.

Associations

2009 - Present

Patent Litigation Subcommitee of ABA Section of Litigation

Co-chair

2007 - 2009

Intellectual Property Lawyers Association of Chicago

Member

Education

1981

Stanford University Law School

J.D.

1978

University of Notre Dame

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2016

The Rise of the "Footprint" Approach to Damages: What's New in 2016?

Apportionment in Lost Profits Damages

2014

ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law and the ABA Center for Professional Development Webinar

Reasonable Royalty Damages: How to Satisfy the Judge and Persuade the Jury

2014

ABA Litigation Section Annual Conference

Patent Trolls: Do They Help or Hurt Innovation and Will the New Legislation Kill Them?

2012

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago

Determining Damages in Patent Cases Since Uniloc 's Prohibition on Using the 25% Rule

2010

Practising Law Institute, Patent Litigation Program

Issues and Considerations Associated with Concurrent Reexamination: A Litigator's Perspective

Publications

2015

ABA Intellectual Property Law Newsletter Supreme Court Announces New Standard for Review of Claim Construction Rulings

2014

ABA Intellectual Property Litigation Committee newsletter SCOTUS Rejects Expanded Concept of Induced Infringement

2014

Landslide, ABA Intellectual Property Law Section Post-Uniloc Reasonable Royalty Damages: What to Do Now and How to Present It to the Jury?

2007

National Law Journal Patent Litigators are Placed in Role of Translators

2004

National Law Journal Hatch-Waxman Changes
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution