Arthur George Jaros Jr.

Arthur George Jaros Jr.

5.0
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 50 years

Tax Lawyer at Oak Brook, IL
Practice Areas: Tax, Corporate & Incorporation, Litigation ... +10 more

1200 Harger Road, Suite 830, Oak Brook, IL

About Arthur

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 350-400 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 9 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 2016

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois for 50 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1975

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

The Law Office of Arthur G. Jaros, Jr.

1200 Harger Road, Suite 830, Oak Brook, IL, 60523

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Arthur George Jaros Jr.'s Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

5 star (2)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by anonymous | January 31, 2016 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

The best tax lawyer and litigator ever

I was is desperate shape from tax standpoint about to lose everything. Art saves me from the government and got me straightened out as only he could and today I am back on track being productive again. II owe it all to him. He is the best lawyer I have ever known.

Posted by anonymous | October 5, 2010

Best Lawyer Ever

Art represented us in an IRS matter in our darkest hour ever and was an absolute god-send. He is the best and most ethical, smartest lawyer we have ever known and he is as compassionate and reasonable in his rates as he is smart.

See All Client Reviews

Arthur George Jaros Jr.'s Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Arthur
Robert G. Robinson headshot
Robert Robinson

Litigation lawyer | Jan 19

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Art represented a family member in a protracted arbitration proceeding. Despite the apparent unlimited resources provided to the opposing high profile Chicago law firm, the results Art achieved were extraordinary."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

1976

Silver Medal, Nov. 1976 Illinois Uniform C.P.A. exam, Illinois C.P.A. Society

1976

Elijah Watt Sells Certificate of Honorable Mention, AICPA

1972

Alpha Kappa Psi Scholarship Award, Alpha Kappa Psi

1968

Gustavus Adophus--LCA Merit Scholar, National Merit Scholarship Corp./LCA

Work Experience

2007 - Present

Attorney, Law Office of Arthur G. Jaros, Jr.

1978 - 2006

Attorney/Partner, Richter & Jaros a/k/a Richter Jaros & Dudgeon a/k/a Richter Jaros & Robinson

1975 - 1978

Tax Specialist/Tax Supervisor, Coopers & Lybrand (Now Price Waterhouse Coopers)

Associations

1994 - Present

DuPage County Bar Association

1975 - Present

Illinois State Bar Association

1973 - Present

Christian Legal Society

Sample of Legal Cases

Estate of David J. Sheehan, San Diego County, CA Superior Court, 37-2015-00016958-PR-PL-CTL

Claim of client settled before trial under which settlement the surviving spouse "paid a substantial amount of money to the creditor ... ."

Smith v. SIPI (II), 501 BR 843 (Bankr. ND IL), rev'd by 526 BR 737 (ND IL 2014), rev'd by 811 F.3d 228 (7th Cir 2016)

After trial, bk ct. ruled for debtors but limited relief to one $15,000 homestead exemption. District court reversed for tax buyer and assignee; USCA reversed and aff'd bk court. Clients' Petition to U.S.S.Ct. for Writ of Cert. filed 5-31-2016 as #15-1475

In re: Mark G. Miller, 13 B 40796 (Bankr N.D. Ill.)

Trustee abandoned claim as to death time interest in living trust and bk court denied trustee's motion for turnover with prejudice as to IRA.

Sarah A. Morris, 14 B 23125 (Bankr. N.D. Illnois 2014)

Plan confirmed over objections.

Cosentino v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C.Memo 2014-186; 108 TCM 273

For Client Taxpayers-Petitioners

Carlson v. Bukovic, 621 F.3d 610 (7th Cir. 2010), cert den. 562 U.S. 1271 (2011)

Jury verdict for officer aff'd stating jury could conclude that the officer's contact with plaintiff's arm may have been so light and so momentary that it did not convey ... a demonstration of anything more than an encouragement that she leave the area.

Smith v. SIPI (I), 07 A 00239 (Bankr N.D. Ill.), aff'd by 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51600, rev'd by 614 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2010).

Bankruptcy and District Court rulings against the Plaintiffs-Debtors were reversed and the case remanded for trial.

Eagle Cove Camp v Town of Woodboro, et al., 10 CV 118 (W.D. Wis). aff'd 734 F3d 673 (7th Cir 2013) cert den 134 SCt 2160 (2014)

SJ against client plaintffs on 10 of 11 counts aff'd on appeal but decision overruled in part by 7th Circuit during April, 2015 in unrelated follow-on RLUIPA litigation; state ct action and 2nd appeal to USCA7 are pending.

IMI Norgren v. D&D Tooling & Mfg., 306 F.Supp.2d 796 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

Motion to enforce was denied.

Macken v. Jensen, 333 F.3d 797 (7th Cir. 2003)

Dismissal in favor of client trustee affirmed on appeal.

Thomas J. Mitchell, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Memo 2000-145; 79 TCM 1954

For Client Taxpayers-Petitioners

John E. Strong v. Internal Revenue Service, 203 BR 105; 78 AFTR2d 96-7667 (Bankr N.D. Illinois 1996)

IRS Motion to Dismiss Client Debtor's Adversary Complaint re: Extent of IRS Liens Denied.

In re Puckett, 193 B,.R. 842 (Bankr. N.D. Ill)

Motion to reopen was denied and client's discharge remained intact

MXL Industries v. Bernard Mulder, 252 Ill.App.3d 18 (2nd District 1993)

Decl judgment and judgment for landlord $211,230.64 + $67,277 in trial ct legal fees + addtl app ct legal fees

Passon v. TCR, Inc., 242 Ill.App.3d 259; 608 N.E.2d 1346 (2nd District 1993).

Reversed and remanded

In re Marriage of Donna J. Sanda and Karl L. Sanda, 245 Ill.App.3d 314 (2nd District 1993)

$18,297.80 award affirmed but denial of fees for related Cook County case reversed and remanded.

Richard W. Jones v. Internal Revenue Service, 129 BR 1003, 21 BCD 1573 (Bankr. N.D. Illinois 1991)

Held for Client Debtor-Taxpayer

Frank O. Butler v. Jorie Butler Kent et al, on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County: 215 Ill.App.3d 680 (1st Dist 1991)

Trial court declaratory judgment for client plaintiff affirmed on appeal; award of attorneys fees not defended successfully on appeal by appellate counsel.

Anilina Fabrique de Colorants v. Aakash Chemicals & Dyestuffs, 856 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1988)

Default judgment vacated and case remanded.

Morgan v. Kanak, 86 A 947 (Bankr. N.D. Illinois)

Non-client Debtor proven guilty at trial of common law fraud and debt was ruled non-dischargeable.

Group V Partnership, 85 B 14238 (Bankr. N.D. Illinois), affirmed by 73 BR 342 (N.D. Illinois).

For Client Substitute General Partner

Perimeter Exhibits v. Glenbard Molded Binder v. Bruckman et al., 122 Ill.App.3d 504, 461 N.E.2d 44 (2nd Dist 1984)

Default Judgment Affirmed

See More Legal Cases

Education

1975

University of Chicago Law School

J.D.

1972

Gustavus Adolphus College

BA - Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude

Speaking Engagements

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution