Edward Keith Runyan

Edward Keith Runyan

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.0

Licensed for 25 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Fargo, ND
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Patent Application, Antitrust & Trade Law

2534 S University Drive, STE 4, Fargo, ND

About Edward

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Patent Infringement 90%

Most of my clients have been sued for patent infringement, but I have also represented clients who were asserting their patent rights.

26 years | 30 cases

90%
Patent Application 8%

26 years | 30 cases

8%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 25 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 2000

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Neustel Law Offices, LTD

2534 S University Drive, STE 4, Fargo, ND, 58103

Neustel Law Offices, LTD

Remote location, Chicago, IL, 60601

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Edward Keith Runyan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Edward Keith Runyan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Edward
Philip John Berenz headshot
Philip Berenz

Patent infringement lawyer | May 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer as he is persevering and fights strategically. In fact, he is known to employ strategies to avoid protracted litigation in the patent field for successful results. I have known Ed for at least 14 years+ and I would refer him to my friends, family and business clients in need of patent infringement and prosecution issues--especially as he has an engineering background in addition to his law degree. A key "fit"."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.0 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2006 - Present

Partner, Baker & McKenzie

2003 - 2006

Associate, Kirkland & Ellis LLP

2000 - 2003

Associate, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Associations

2009 - Present

Federal Trial Bar for the Northern District of Illinois

2000 - Present

Intellectual Property Owners Association

1997 - Present

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Sample of Legal Cases

Creative Integrated Systems v. Nintendo of America, et al..

Settled after jury trial

Barco N.V. v. Aydin Displays, Inc.

Favorable settlement.

New Medium Tech. v. Barco, N.V. et al.

Patents found unenforceable; favorable settlement

Grohe America, Inc. v. CEG Holdings, LLC

Case dismissed.

Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Herzog Contracting

Alloc Inc. v. Pergo Inc.

Complete victory for my client, Alloc on multiple grounds.

Siliconix, Inc. v. Denso Corp.

LML Patent Corp. v. Telecheck Services, et al.

Favorable settlement

Agere Systems, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.

Nilssen, et al. v. Osram Sylvania Inc., et al.

Defense victory due to inequitable conduct

Barco, N.V. v. Patriot Scientific, et al.

Alloc, Inc. v. Unilin Decor NV et al.

Neil Schultz v. iGPS Inc. et al.

RecogniCorp v. Nintendo of America et al.

pending

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

DePaul University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1982

Purdue University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

2014

Baker & McKenzie News & Insights Attorneys' Fees in Patent Cases

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution