Creative Integrated Systems v. Nintendo of America, et al..
Mar 19, 2014OUTCOME: Settled after jury trial
Represented defendants Nintendo and Macronix in infringement case involving Mask ROM memory technology.
Fargo, ND
Patent infringement Lawyer at Fargo, ND
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Patent Application, Antitrust & Trade Law
OUTCOME: Settled after jury trial
Represented defendants Nintendo and Macronix in infringement case involving Mask ROM memory technology.
OUTCOME: Favorable settlement.
Infringement action brought by Barco, N.V., inventor of LCD displays with anti-flicker feature for SONAR applications.
OUTCOME: Patents found unenforceable; favorable settlement
Two of 11 asserted patents were found unenforceable-but this judgment was vacated following settlement between the parties.
OUTCOME: Case dismissed.
Patent Infringement Litigation.
OUTCOME:
Patent Infringement Litigation.
OUTCOME: Complete victory for my client, Alloc on multiple grounds.
Alloc filed a declaratory judgment action, and Pergo responded by counterclaiming for infringement. The case was tried to a jury over two weeks. The jury found Alloc not only did not infringe, but th ... at Pergo had in fact derived its patents from Alloc's former employee. Pergo's patents were also found to be invalid on multiple other grounds. Pergo appealed to the Federal Circuit, which affirmed in February 2010.
OUTCOME:
Patent Infringement Litigation.
OUTCOME: Favorable settlement
OUTCOME:
Patent Infringement Litigation.
OUTCOME: Defense victory due to inequitable conduct
Patent Infringement Litigation.