Mark J Freeman

Mark J Freeman

5.0
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 38 years

Workers compensation Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Workers Compensation

100 S 5th St., Ste. 1240, Minneapolis, MN

About Mark

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 120 minutes

Contingency

20%-25%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in South Dakota for 29 years

State: South Dakota

Acquired: 1997

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Minnesota for 38 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 1987

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Licensed in Wisconsin for 25 years

State: Wisconsin

Acquired: 2000

Administrative Suspension

No misconduct found

Location

Teplinsky Law Group

100 S 5th St., Ste. 1240, Minneapolis, MN, 55402

Thill and Freeman, PLLC

5353 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 208, St. Louis Park, MN, 55416

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Mark J Freeman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

6 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (6) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 6
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Jennifer | March 26, 2015 | Workers Compensation

A wonderful Workers Compensation Lawyer

Mark Freeman is a very dedicated and professional attorney. He is very compassionate. He has a great deal of knowledge and experience and I feel very confident about recommending him to anyone who needs a workers compensation attorney

See All Client Reviews

Mark J Freeman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Mark
Ryan John Courtney headshot
Ryan Courtney

Workers compensation lawyer | Apr 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mark Freeman is an extremely experienced workers compensation attorney with a history of handling cases involving all nature of injuries and disputes. I've found that he does a excellent job of truly understanding the needs of each client and working to make sure those needs are met. He recognizes that every case is different and takes the time to make sure that every case is handled in the most effective manner possible. This results in the best possible outcomes for his client."

View All Endorsements
Ryan John Courtney headshot
Ryan Courtney

Workers compensation lawyer

David Owen Nirenstein headshot
David Nirenstein

Workers compensation lawyer

David N Larson headshot
David Larson

Workers compensation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2021

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2020

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2019

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2018

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2018

AV Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2017

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Workers Compensation Law, Lead Counsel

2015

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2002

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Work Comp Attorney, Thill and Freeman PLLC

1900 - Present

Member, Thill and Freeman, PLLC

1987 - 2012

Work Comp Attorney, Fitch

Associations

2000 - Present

State Bar of Wisconsin

Member

1987 - Present

Minnesota State Bar Association

Member

1987 - Present

Hennepin County Bar Association

Member

1987 - Present

State Bar of South Dakota

Member

1987 - Present

Minnesota Association for Justice

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Hagos v. LSG Sky Chef

Employee Prevailed

Stone v. Lakehead Constructors

Minnesota Supreme Court upheld equitable apportionment

See More Legal Cases

Education

1987

William Mitchell College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1984

University of Michigan

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2012

Workers Compensation Symposium

Medical Benefits

2012

Workers Compensation Institute

Workers Compensation

2010

Workers Compensation Basics

Workers Compensation

2004

Introduction to Workers Compensation

Introduction to Workers Compensation

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution