Cedrick Rommel Frazier

Mr. Frazier represented on behalf of the school board. He presented himself professionally several months before he assumed my case from the licensing board. Until the point he took over, I had not submitted anything to refute the case that had been filed against me which, largely as a whole, was... distorted. I sought to present a truthful depiction of what happened, but I was advised by Mr. Frazier not to do so as it would offer no increased chance of keeping my license. There were half a dozen emails and several phone calls between the two of us. In my final phone call to him, I referenced an email that was sent to me by the other party (which I had previously referenced twice through email). Mr. Frazier was unaware of any emails being sent to me from the other party. This was not insignificant as the content invalidated key accusations from the other party. Despite me sharing these details several times, Mr. Frazier was intent on not submitting anything on my behalf--apparently unaware they existed. Disappointed with Mr. Frazier's attempt to inquire the full and true story, I hired a private attorney specializing in this area and, appropriately, took the approach contrary to Mr. Frazier's advice. While I hold no ill-will towards Mr. Frazier, I must seriously question his integrity of representing his clients; it seemed in hindsight that he was only representing the board. Following his advice would have almost certainly resulted in the loss of my license. I'm very glad I switched to another attorney.