Graham vs. Boerger
Aug 14, 2015OUTCOME: The trial court properly interpreted a settlement agreement between siblings who were beneficiaries to a trust and estate.
Question regarding the scope and enforceability of a settlement agreement.
Rockville, MD
Estate planning Lawyer at Rockville, MD
Practice Areas: Estate Planning, Probate
OUTCOME: The trial court properly interpreted a settlement agreement between siblings who were beneficiaries to a trust and estate.
Question regarding the scope and enforceability of a settlement agreement.
OUTCOME: Trial court erred by dismissing an insurer's subrogation claim against the minor child.
Question regarding a whether a parent may discharge a child's liability in bankruptcy.
OUTCOME: The fact that an insurer held insurance policies for both a vehicle driver and a vehicle operator who were involved in a collision did not constitute a conflict of interest that voided its subrogation interest.
Insurance subrogation case.
OUTCOME: Where wife and decedent were married by minister who was not licensed by Ohio Secretary of State to solemnize marriages, their marriage was voidable rather than void, and wife was decedent's surviving spouse for purposes of decedent's estate.
Questioned regarding the validity of a marriage.
OUTCOME: Non-conforming goods were not effectively rejected.
The trial court was correct in finding, after a bench trial was held, that the construction company did not effectively reject nonconforming range hood and exhaust fan supplied by the equipment supplie ... r and was therefore liable to the suppler for the contract price of the goods.