Alf R H R Langan

Alf R H R Langan

2.2
Rating: 5.0

Licensed for 39 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Green Bay, WI
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Family, Tax ... +2 more

2300 Riverside Dr, Green Bay, WI

About Alf

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 30%

All misdemeanors and felonies, both federal and state. Have handled cases involving but not limited to: drunk driving, sexual assault, possession of child pornography, felony assault, kidnapping, possession of illegal narcotics, distribution of illegal narcotics, possession of narcotics without a valid prescription, and welfare fraud.

35 years

30%
Family 30%

Divorce, child custody, child support, adoption, post divorce motions.

35 years

30%
Tax 15%

I help people who owe past due personal and/or business taxes negotiate settlements with IRS and Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue.

21 years

15%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 190-200 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Wisconsin for 34 years

State: Wisconsin

Acquired: 1991

Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2020

Licensed in Illinois for 39 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1986

Administrative - Not Authorized to Practice

Location

Law Offices of Alf R H R Langan

2300 Riverside Dr, Green Bay, WI, 54301-1900

Law Offices of Alf R H R Langan

403 South Jefferson, Green Bay, WI, 54301-4118

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Alf R H R Langan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.2 /5.0

10 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (10) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | General Knowledge

Posted by Betty | September 25, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody

Not a good lawyer

He was hired by my daughter. He was unable to perform and get results for numerous tasks as an lawyer. Do not use him he doesn’t know law. He didn’t assist with her rights to see her daughter.

Posted by Joan | March 28, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Tax

A bad experience

Very disappointed with this attorney whose handling of our case caused us a tremendous amount of grief and anxiety. As a recent graduate of law school, I was looking forward to working with him and learning from him but this attorney demonstrated how clients should never be treated. After our initi...al two meetings and he had been paid, Attorney Langan did not initiate any contact with us whatsoever other than to send additional billings and forward docket filings; filings that we had already obtained ourselves. Our case in the Tax Court had been ongoing for sixteen months by the time Langan was hired and entered an appearance in our case. I sent him copies of the paperwork pertinent to the case, including the results of our discovery requests via USPS Certified Mail. He did not acknowledge that he even received them. Not once did he ask us questions about the facts of the case or what had taken place to date. Consequently, he made a number of errors in the facts he presented to the Court in his pleadings. He appeared for us at the Calendar Call in Tax Court and refused to provide us with a copy of the transcript of the hearing saying even though it existed in the docket, “I don’t know why you would want a copy, I already told you about the hearing.” The judge ordered him to file a brief in the case. What he filed was in the form of a motion and didn’t contain any of the necessary elements of a brief. We sent him an e-mail asking why it wasn’t submitted in the proper form. Langan’s response was: “Do you really want me to answer this, or did you just need to rant. I know you graduated from law school, but you are NOT a lawyer.” He also filed a Motion to Supplement the Record; a motion that was stricken from the record in the case. When we asked him for a clarification concerning the judge’s order, his response was, “If I understand this correctly, the Court rules that since you did not sign the Motion to Supplement the Record that it denied the Motion. We can re-submit the Motion if you wish, I would simply add a signature line for you and Gary, then scan in the signed document and re-file it.” I have no idea why he would say this since he obviously is the attorney representing us and we would not be required to sign his motions in order to have them filed. This same motion indicated that an exhibit was attached, but he failed to attach it. This exhibit consisted of a Forensic Document Examiner’s Report that we had paid $1,500.00 for. Also, Langan had signed an agreement promising to pay the examiner for any additional costs out of the funds in our client escrow account. When Langan received additional billings from the examiner, he would forward them onto us expecting us to pay them even though the invoices were made out to him and he was responsible for their payment. After reviewing our case, Langan told us that we had been treated “egregiously” by the settlement officer in the Collection Due Process Hearing. However, in the Reply Brief that he submitted to the Court, he made an unwarranted derogatory comment about our conduct when dealing with the IRS settlement officer. When we asked him what he was referring to, he actually denied making the statement, even though it clearly appears on Page 7 of the brief. His exact words written in an e-mail to us were: “I did not label you as belligerent; in fact, that word does not appear in my Brief.” Finally, we asked him to withdraw from the case and he agreed. However, the Court denied his motion because it was not done in the proper form and did not comply with Tax Court Rule 24(c).We provided him with a copy of a proper withdrawal motion and it was granted by the Court. We did not feel Attorney Langan demonstrated a high level of skill or professionalism; nor did he exemplify the legal profession’s ideals of honest and ethical dealings in order to protect our legitimate interests in our case.

Posted by Kevin oliver | March 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney | DUI & DWI

DO NOT HIRE HIM

Very very unprofessional.He has a great paralegal daniel.But he just want money a more money and cant tell u whats going on with ur case.received and email from his paralegal the the DA was dropping the owi charge,get to court ask mr langan and he knows nothing,how are u going to represent me and you... not communicating with ur paralegal.PLEASE DO NOT WASTE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by anonymous | August 26, 2015 | Hired Attorney

I would hire him again

Mr. Langan is an honest, ethical attorney and truly listens to the needs of his clients. He is very willing to present different options and fully discuss the possible outcomes. His advice and legal work have been invaluable to me. His staff is very responsive, organized, and available. I would highl...y recommend Attorney Langan!

See All Client Reviews

Alf R H R Langan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Alf

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  5.0 (Average)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020.

Public Reprimand issued in WI, 2020

updated on 11/25/2020

Reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.

Public Reprimand issued in WI, 2011

updated on 04/23/2013

Reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.

Associations

1999 - Present

Green Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Fellowship

Board President/Member

1994 - 1997

Family Violence Center

Board Member

Education

1984

St Louis U

law

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution